PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLBP.L is traded in GBp, while NDUS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NDUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLBP.L achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than NDUS.L's 8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XLBP.L has underperformed NDUS.L with an annualized return of 10.67%, while NDUS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.


XLBP.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.77%
YTD
12.87%
6M
15.98%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
10.67%

NDUS.L

1D
0.34%
1M
0.51%
YTD
8.34%
6M
9.72%
1Y
18.02%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLBP.L
Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF
12.87%3.47%0.77%6.09%-1.67%28.80%15.99%19.70%-9.97%12.17%
NDUS.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF
8.28%31.09%9.55%23.94%-11.56%20.88%9.95%27.06%-12.36%20.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XLBP.L and NDUS.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between XLBP.L and NDUS.L has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLBP.L
NDUS.L

Basic Materials

89.8%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
0.3%

Industrials

1.6%
98.6%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.4%

Energy

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Basic Materials

XLBP.L
89.8%
NDUS.L
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XLBP.L
8.6%
NDUS.L
0.3%

Industrials

XLBP.L
1.6%
NDUS.L
98.6%

Communication Services

XLBP.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

XLBP.L

-

NDUS.L
0.4%

Energy

XLBP.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Financial Services

XLBP.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Healthcare

XLBP.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Real Estate

XLBP.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Technology

XLBP.L

-

NDUS.L
0.3%

Utilities

XLBP.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLBP.L
XLBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
XLBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NDUS.L
NDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLBP.LNDUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.27

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.29

4.51

+1.78

XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLBP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the NDUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLBP.L and NDUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLBP.LNDUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

0.96

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.69

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.70

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.67

-0.10

Drawdowns

XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLBP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum NDUS.L drawdown of -35.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBP.L and NDUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLBP.LNDUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-35.08%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-14.16%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.98%

-16.78%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

-25.04%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

-35.08%

+6.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-3.91%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-5.27%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

3.98%

-0.80%

Volatility

XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) is 5.17%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that XLBP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLBP.LNDUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

6.66%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

15.79%

-3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

18.78%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

18.68%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

19.49%

-1.29%

XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLBP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than NDUS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLBP.L nor NDUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XLBP.L and NDUS.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLBP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLBP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for NDUS.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLBP.L and 0.18% for NDUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLBP.L and NDUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer