XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L
XLBP.L (Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF) and NDUS.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from Invesco and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLBP.L returned 10.67%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for NDUS.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLBP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for NDUS.L.
Performance
XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLBP.L is traded in GBp, while NDUS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NDUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLBP.L achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than NDUS.L's 8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XLBP.L has underperformed NDUS.L with an annualized return of 10.67%, while NDUS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.
XLBP.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
NDUS.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 8.34%
- 6M
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 18.02%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLBP.L Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.87% | 3.47% | 0.77% | 6.09% | -1.67% | 28.80% | 15.99% | 19.70% | -9.97% | 12.17% |
NDUS.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF | 8.28% | 31.09% | 9.55% | 23.94% | -11.56% | 20.88% | 9.95% | 27.06% | -12.36% | 20.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLBP.L and NDUS.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLBP.L and NDUS.L has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLBP.L
NDUS.L
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
XLBP.L
NDUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLBP.L
NDUS.L
Industrials
XLBP.L
NDUS.L
Communication Services
XLBP.L
-
NDUS.L
Consumer Defensive
XLBP.L
-
NDUS.L
Energy
XLBP.L
-
NDUS.L
Financial Services
XLBP.L
-
NDUS.L
Healthcare
XLBP.L
-
NDUS.L
Real Estate
XLBP.L
-
NDUS.L
Technology
XLBP.L
-
NDUS.L
Utilities
XLBP.L
-
NDUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLBP.L
NDUS.L
XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLBP.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 1.27 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.29 | 4.51 | +1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLBP.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.96 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.69 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.70 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.67 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLBP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum NDUS.L drawdown of -35.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBP.L and NDUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLBP.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -35.08% | +6.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -14.16% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.98% | -16.78% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -25.04% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.58% | -35.08% | +6.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -3.91% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -5.27% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 3.98% | -0.80% |
Volatility
XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) is 5.17%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that XLBP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLBP.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 6.66% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 15.79% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.85% | 18.78% | -3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 18.68% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 19.49% | -1.29% |
XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLBP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than NDUS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLBP.L vs. NDUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLBP.L nor NDUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLBP.L and NDUS.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLBP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLBP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for NDUS.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLBP.L and 0.18% for NDUS.L.
Find the right allocation for XLBP.L and NDUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer