PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLB vs. FENY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLB vs. FENY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLB achieves a 15.57% return, which is significantly lower than FENY's 29.64% return. Over the past 10 years, XLB has outperformed FENY with an annualized return of 10.54%, while FENY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.


XLB

1D
1.87%
1M
0.23%
YTD
15.57%
6M
16.68%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
10.54%

FENY

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
29.64%
6M
28.30%
1Y
37.40%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
20.03%
10Y*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLB vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
15.57%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
29.64%7.27%6.62%-0.04%62.94%55.62%-33.15%9.11%-19.99%-2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XLB and FENY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between XLB and FENY has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLB vs. FENY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLB
FENY

Basic Materials

87.6%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%

-

Industrials

1.5%
0.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

99.7%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

XLB
87.6%
FENY
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XLB
12.4%
FENY

-

Industrials

XLB
1.5%
FENY
0.1%

Communication Services

XLB

-

FENY

-

Consumer Defensive

XLB

-

FENY

-

Energy

XLB

-

FENY
99.7%

Financial Services

XLB

-

FENY

-

Healthcare

XLB

-

FENY

-

Real Estate

XLB

-

FENY

-

Technology

XLB

-

FENY

-

Utilities

XLB

-

FENY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLB vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FENY
FENY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FENY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FENY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FENY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FENY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FENY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLB vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLBFENYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

3.19

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.05

8.93

-3.88

XLB vs. FENY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLB Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the FENY Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLB and FENY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLB vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLB drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, smaller than the maximum FENY drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB and FENY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLBFENYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.83%

-74.35%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-11.78%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

-21.47%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-26.64%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.27%

-69.07%

+31.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-8.22%

+5.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.83%

-23.08%

+12.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

4.20%

-0.16%

Volatility

XLB vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison

Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) have volatilities of 7.05% and 7.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLBFENYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

7.15%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.58%

16.58%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.49%

20.47%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.06%

26.51%

-7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

29.79%

-9.09%

XLB vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLB has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLB vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison

XLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than FENY's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
2.46%3.18%3.05%3.33%3.33%3.69%4.60%6.43%3.21%2.94%2.29%3.05%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.68%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLB and FENY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FENY has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to XLB (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLB dropped -59.83% vs FENY's -74.35%.

On 10-year performance, XLB leads with 10.54% vs 9.24% for FENY. On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLB has been the lower-risk option at 7.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLB has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLB.

FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 1.68% for XLB.

XLB is categorized as Materials, while FENY is Energy Equities. XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index, while FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLB and 0.08% for FENY.

FENY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLB and FENY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer