XJUL vs. BNO

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

XJUL (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - XJUL is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. XJUL is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, XJUL returned 9.45% vs 33.55% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. XJUL charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.

Performance

XJUL vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJUL achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 39.16% return.

XJUL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 4.19%
• YTD: 4.19%
• 1Y: 9.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: -3.15%
• 1M: -24.92%
• 6M: 39.16%
• YTD: 39.16%
• 1Y: 33.55%
• 3Y*: 15.66%
• 5Y*: 14.93%
• 10Y*: 10.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJUL vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July	4.19%	10.19%	10.58%	4.05%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	39.16%	-5.44%	9.67%	-0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XJUL and BNO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2023	-0.06

The correlation between XJUL and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XJUL vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJUL

XJUL Risk / Return Rank: 87
XJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
XJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
XJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
XJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
XJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 26
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 27
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJUL vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XJUL	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	0.82	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	1.34	+2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.17	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	0.98	+2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.72	3.20	+15.52

XJUL vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJUL and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XJUL vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJUL drawdown since its inception was -9.10%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJUL and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XJUL	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.10%	-87.06%	+77.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-34.46%	+31.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-34.46%	+34.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.56%	-40.09%	+39.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	10.51%	-10.00%

Volatility

XJUL vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) is 0.48%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 11.13%. This indicates that XJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XJUL	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	11.13%	-10.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.16%	37.90%	-34.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.13%	41.33%	-37.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.90%	35.79%	-28.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.90%	36.72%	-29.82%

XJUL vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

XJUL vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither XJUL nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XJUL and BNO in my portfolio?

XJUL and BNO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XJUL or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (11.13%) compared to XJUL (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJUL dropped -9.10% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, XJUL or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 33.55% vs 9.45% for XJUL. On fees, XJUL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XJUL or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 33.55% return vs 9.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XJUL or BNO?

XJUL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XJUL or BNO?

XJUL and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XJUL and BNO?

XJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XJUL and 1.00% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.