XJUL vs. IVVB

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

XJUL (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July) and IVVB (iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XJUL returned 9.45% vs 13.00% for IVVB. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XJUL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IVVB.

Performance

XJUL vs. IVVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJUL achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly lower than IVVB's 4.66% return.

XJUL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 4.19%
• YTD: 4.19%
• 1Y: 9.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVVB

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 4.66%
• YTD: 4.66%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: 11.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJUL vs. IVVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July	4.19%	10.19%	10.58%	4.05%
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF	4.66%	9.60%	18.66%	1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XJUL and IVVB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2023	0.87

The correlation between XJUL and IVVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XJUL vs. IVVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJUL

XJUL Risk / Return Rank: 87
XJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
XJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
XJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
XJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
XJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

IVVB

IVVB Risk / Return Rank: 61
IVVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
IVVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
IVVB Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IVVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
IVVB Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJUL vs. IVVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XJUL	IVVB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.76	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	2.47	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.33	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	2.27	+1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.72	9.64	+9.08

XJUL vs. IVVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the IVVB Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJUL and IVVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XJUL vs. IVVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJUL drawdown since its inception was -9.10%, smaller than the maximum IVVB drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJUL and IVVB.

Drawdown Indicators

	XJUL	IVVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.10%	-13.08%	+3.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-5.75%	+2.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.07%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.56%	-1.58%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	1.35%	-0.84%

Volatility

XJUL vs. IVVB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) is 0.48%, while iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that XJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XJUL	IVVB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	1.88%	-1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.16%	5.43%	-2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.13%	7.41%	-3.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.90%	9.22%	-2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.90%	9.22%	-2.32%

XJUL vs. IVVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVB's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XJUL vs. IVVB - Dividend Comparison

XJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF	1.17%	1.22%	0.87%
XJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XJUL and IVVB in my portfolio?

XJUL and IVVB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XJUL or IVVB?

IVVB has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to XJUL (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJUL dropped -9.10% vs IVVB's -13.08%.

Which ETF is better, XJUL or IVVB?

On 1-year performance, IVVB leads with 13.00% vs 9.45% for XJUL. On fees, IVVB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XJUL or IVVB?

Over the 1-year period, IVVB has performed better with a 13.00% return vs 9.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XJUL or IVVB?

IVVB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XJUL or IVVB?

IVVB has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for XJUL.

What is the main difference between XJUL and IVVB?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XJUL and 0.50% for IVVB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.