XJR vs. ROSC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - XJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index while ROSC tracks the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XJR returned 6.15%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for ROSC. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XJR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.

Performance

XJR vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than ROSC's 16.64% return.

XJR

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: 19.44%
• 6M: 17.14%
• 1Y: 32.21%
• 3Y*: 16.10%
• 5Y*: 6.15%
• 10Y*: —

ROSC

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 16.64%
• 6M: 14.85%
• 1Y: 34.90%
• 3Y*: 17.42%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: 11.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJR vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF	19.44%	4.73%	9.59%	16.39%	-17.30%	24.96%	35.61%
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	16.64%	10.18%	7.28%	18.88%	-10.58%	31.37%	27.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and ROSC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020	0.96

The correlation between XJR and ROSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

XJR vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XJR	ROSC
Financial Services	18.2%	18.4%
Technology	16.8%	13.0%
Industrials	15.5%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	14.6%
Healthcare	10.7%	20.0%
Real Estate	7.6%	5.6%
Energy	4.7%	3.2%
Basic Materials	4.5%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	6.4%
Communication Services	2.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.0%	1.9%

Return for Risk

XJR vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR

XJR Risk / Return Rank: 61
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 65

ROSC

ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 79
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XJR	ROSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.27	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.30	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.40	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	4.52	-1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.11	14.75	-3.64

XJR vs. ROSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the ROSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and ROSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XJR vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and ROSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XJR	ROSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.14%	-43.13%	+15.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	-7.75%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.14%	-23.74%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.14%	-23.74%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-0.33%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.39%	-7.18%	-2.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	2.37%	+0.54%

Volatility

XJR vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) at 3.54%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XJR	ROSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	3.54%	+1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.61%	10.40%	+2.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.03%	15.53%	+2.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.44%	19.29%	+2.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.70%	20.24%	+1.46%

XJR vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

XJR vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than ROSC's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	1.79%	2.08%	2.00%	2.01%	1.51%	2.13%	1.75%	3.05%	2.86%	2.13%	2.20%	2.48%
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF	0.96%	1.14%	1.96%	0.92%	1.29%	2.00%	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XJR and ROSC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, XJR and ROSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XJR or ROSC?

XJR has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to ROSC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs ROSC's -43.13%.

Which ETF is better, XJR or ROSC?

On 5-year performance, ROSC leads with 8.95% vs 6.15% for XJR. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XJR or ROSC?

Over the 5-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XJR or ROSC?

XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XJR or ROSC?

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.96% for XJR.

What is the main difference between XJR and ROSC?

XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.34% for ROSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.