PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJR vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJR vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.


XJR

1D
-0.96%
1M
2.16%
YTD
14.91%
6M
13.91%
1Y
28.36%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.76%
1M
-18.50%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-29.84%
1Y
-38.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJR vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
14.91%4.73%13.44%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.48%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and IBIT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJR vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XJRIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.86

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

-0.79

+3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

-1.36

+11.07

XJR vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XJRIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

-0.89

+2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.30

+0.37

Drawdowns

XJR vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJRIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-49.36%

+22.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-49.36%

+39.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-48.10%

+47.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-16.02%

+6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

28.44%

-25.51%

Volatility

XJR vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) is 4.77%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that XJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJRIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

9.50%

-4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.22%

34.44%

-22.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.85%

43.73%

-25.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

50.19%

-28.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

50.19%

-28.46%

XJR vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XJR vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.99%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XJR and IBIT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to XJR (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, XJR leads with 28.36% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XJR has performed better with a 28.36% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

XJR has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

XJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.25% for IBIT.

XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJR and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer