PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJR vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJR vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 20.97% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -29.06% return.


XJR

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.09%
6M
15.44%
YTD
20.97%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.79%
1M
-2.28%
6M
-32.10%
YTD
-29.06%
1Y
-47.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJR vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
20.97%4.73%12.87%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-29.06%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and IBIT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJR vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XJRIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.82

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

-0.90

+3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

-1.46

+10.96

XJR vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XJR vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJRIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-53.30%

+26.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-53.30%

+43.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-50.60%

+47.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-17.56%

+8.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

32.72%

-29.81%

Volatility

XJR vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) is 4.81%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 11.51%. This indicates that XJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJRIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

11.51%

-6.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

34.79%

-22.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.91%

44.38%

-26.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.40%

49.97%

-28.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.64%

49.97%

-28.33%

XJR vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XJR vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.94%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XJR and IBIT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to XJR (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

On 1-year performance, XJR leads with 27.63% vs -47.60% for IBIT. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XJR has performed better with a 27.63% return vs -47.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

XJR has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

XJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.25% for IBIT.

XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJR and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer