XJR vs. FYX
XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) and FYX (First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - XJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index while FYX tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XJR returned 5.38%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for FYX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XJR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FYX.
Performance
XJR vs. FYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly lower than FYX's 18.13% return.
XJR
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- —
FYX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 43.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
XJR vs. FYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 14.91% | 4.73% | 9.59% | 16.39% | -17.30% | 24.96% | 35.61% |
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 18.13% | 12.68% | 12.22% | 18.30% | -18.41% | 27.43% | 39.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJR and FYX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between XJR and FYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
XJR vs. FYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XJR
FYX
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
XJR
FYX
Technology
XJR
FYX
Industrials
XJR
FYX
Consumer Cyclical
XJR
FYX
Healthcare
XJR
FYX
Real Estate
XJR
FYX
Energy
XJR
FYX
Basic Materials
XJR
FYX
Consumer Defensive
XJR
FYX
Communication Services
XJR
FYX
Utilities
XJR
FYX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJR vs. FYX — Risk / Return Rank
XJR
FYX
XJR vs. FYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XJR | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 2.41 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 3.43 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.40 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 5.80 | -2.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 18.69 | -8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XJR | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.41 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.38 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.36 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
XJR vs. FYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum FYX drawdown of -61.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and FYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJR | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.14% | -61.80% | +34.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -7.56% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.14% | -27.91% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | -27.91% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -1.48% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -10.89% | +1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.34% | +0.59% |
Volatility
XJR vs. FYX - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJR | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 4.71% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 12.03% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.85% | 18.28% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 21.96% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 24.21% | -2.48% |
XJR vs. FYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FYX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
XJR vs. FYX - Dividend Comparison
XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than FYX's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.69% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 1.12% | 1.08% | 0.60% | 0.94% | 0.88% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, XJR and FYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XJR has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to FYX (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs FYX's -61.80%.
On 5-year performance, FYX leads with 8.23% vs 5.38% for XJR. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FYX has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 5.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.
XJR has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.69% for FYX.
XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.63% for FYX.
FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XJR and FYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer