PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJR vs. FYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJR vs. FYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than FYX's 22.94% return.


XJR

1D
-0.38%
1M
4.96%
YTD
19.44%
6M
17.14%
1Y
32.21%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*

FYX

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.51%
YTD
22.94%
6M
20.86%
1Y
47.16%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJR vs. FYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
19.44%4.73%9.59%16.39%-17.30%24.96%35.61%
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
22.94%12.68%12.22%18.30%-18.41%27.43%39.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and FYX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.97

The correlation between XJR and FYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

XJR vs. FYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XJR
FYX

Financial Services

18.2%
17.3%

Technology

16.8%
11.7%

Industrials

15.5%
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
11.7%

Healthcare

10.7%
14.0%

Real Estate

7.6%
8.6%

Energy

4.7%
5.7%

Basic Materials

4.5%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
5.3%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.1%

Utilities

2.0%
1.6%

Financial Services

XJR
18.2%
FYX
17.3%

Technology

XJR
16.8%
FYX
11.7%

Industrials

XJR
15.5%
FYX
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XJR
13.5%
FYX
11.7%

Healthcare

XJR
10.7%
FYX
14.0%

Real Estate

XJR
7.6%
FYX
8.6%

Energy

XJR
4.7%
FYX
5.7%

Basic Materials

XJR
4.5%
FYX
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

XJR
2.7%
FYX
5.3%

Communication Services

XJR
2.5%
FYX
3.1%

Utilities

XJR
2.0%
FYX
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJR vs. FYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FYX
FYX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. FYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XJRFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

6.27

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

20.40

-9.29

XJR vs. FYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the FYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and FYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XJR vs. FYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum FYX drawdown of -61.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and FYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJRFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-61.80%

+34.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-7.56%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-27.91%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

-27.91%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.12%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-10.86%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.32%

+0.59%

Volatility

XJR vs. FYX - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) have volatilities of 5.13% and 4.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJRFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

4.89%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

12.29%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

18.42%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

21.96%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.70%

24.20%

-2.50%

XJR vs. FYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FYX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

XJR vs. FYX - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than FYX's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.67%0.64%1.62%1.22%0.95%0.99%0.65%1.12%1.08%0.60%0.94%0.88%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.96%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, XJR and FYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XJR has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to FYX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs FYX's -61.80%.

On 5-year performance, FYX leads with 9.19% vs 6.15% for XJR. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FYX has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.

XJR has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.67% for FYX.

XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.63% for FYX.

FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJR and FYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer