XISE vs. DNOV
XISE (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September) and DNOV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November) are both exchange-traded funds - XISE is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while DNOV is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. XISE is actively managed, while DNOV is passively managed. Over the past year, XISE returned 6.80% vs 17.37% for DNOV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
XISE vs. DNOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XISE achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly lower than DNOV's 4.78% return.
XISE
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 6.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DNOV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 4.78%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 17.37%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.14%
- 10Y*
- —
XISE vs. DNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XISE FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September | 3.00% | 6.42% | 5.70% | 3.09% |
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November | 4.78% | 13.93% | 10.71% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XISE and DNOV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between XISE and DNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
XISE vs. DNOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XISE
DNOV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XISE
DNOV
Financial Services
XISE
DNOV
Communication Services
XISE
DNOV
Consumer Cyclical
XISE
DNOV
Healthcare
XISE
DNOV
Industrials
XISE
DNOV
Consumer Defensive
XISE
DNOV
Energy
XISE
DNOV
Utilities
XISE
DNOV
Real Estate
XISE
DNOV
Basic Materials
XISE
DNOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XISE vs. DNOV — Risk / Return Rank
XISE
DNOV
XISE vs. DNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XISE | DNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 3.05 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.59 | 4.61 | -1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.64 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 4.17 | -0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.31 | 22.39 | -2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XISE | DNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 3.05 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.91 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
XISE vs. DNOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XISE drawdown since its inception was -6.17%, smaller than the maximum DNOV drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XISE and DNOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XISE | DNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -15.03% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.88% | -4.18% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.18% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -2.01% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 0.78% | -0.44% |
Volatility
XISE vs. DNOV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE) is 0.37%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) has a volatility of 0.84%. This indicates that XISE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XISE | DNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | 0.84% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 4.22% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96% | 5.73% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 7.61% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 9.04% | -4.12% |
XISE vs. DNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XISE and DNOV have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
XISE vs. DNOV - Dividend Comparison
XISE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, while DNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XISE FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September | 5.92% | 5.81% | 7.04% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XISE and DNOV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DNOV has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to XISE (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XISE dropped -6.17% vs DNOV's -15.03%.
On 1-year performance, DNOV leads with 17.37% vs 6.80% for XISE. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, XISE has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DNOV has performed better with a 17.37% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XISE and DNOV have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
XISE has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 0.00% for DNOV.
XISE is categorized as Options Trading, while DNOV is Defined Outcome.
DNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XISE and DNOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer