PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XISE vs. FSEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XISE vs. FSEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XISE achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly lower than FSEP's 6.56% return.


XISE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.75%
YTD
3.00%
6M
3.75%
1Y
6.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FSEP

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.58%
YTD
6.56%
6M
7.03%
1Y
17.62%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XISE vs. FSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XISE and FSEP is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023

0.77

The correlation between XISE and FSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

XISE vs. FSEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XISE
FSEP

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

XISE
36.2%
FSEP
36.2%

Financial Services

XISE
11.9%
FSEP
11.9%

Communication Services

XISE
10.9%
FSEP
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XISE
10.1%
FSEP
10.1%

Healthcare

XISE
8.4%
FSEP
8.4%

Industrials

XISE
8.1%
FSEP
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

XISE
4.9%
FSEP
4.9%

Energy

XISE
3.5%
FSEP
3.5%

Utilities

XISE
2.3%
FSEP
2.3%

Real Estate

XISE
1.9%
FSEP
1.9%

Basic Materials

XISE
1.8%
FSEP
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XISE vs. FSEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XISE
XISE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XISE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XISE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XISE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XISE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XISE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FSEP
FSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XISE vs. FSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XISEFSEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.47

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.15

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.31

15.90

+4.41

XISE vs. FSEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XISE Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FSEP Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XISE and FSEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XISEFSEPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.36

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

1.10

+0.29

Drawdowns

XISE vs. FSEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XISE drawdown since its inception was -6.17%, smaller than the maximum FSEP drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XISE and FSEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XISEFSEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-13.79%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.88%

-5.62%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.22%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-2.14%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

1.11%

-0.77%

Volatility

XISE vs. FSEP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE) is 0.37%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that XISE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XISEFSEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

1.19%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

5.79%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96%

7.52%

-4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

10.79%

-5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.92%

10.54%

-5.62%

XISE vs. FSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XISE and FSEP have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

XISE vs. FSEP - Dividend Comparison

XISE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, while FSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


XISE and FSEP have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSEP has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to XISE (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XISE dropped -6.17% vs FSEP's -13.79%.

On 1-year performance, FSEP leads with 17.62% vs 6.80% for XISE. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, XISE has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FSEP has performed better with a 17.62% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XISE and FSEP have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

XISE has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 0.00% for FSEP.

FSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XISE and FSEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer