PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIDV vs. VEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIDV vs. VEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIDV achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly lower than VEU's 14.22% return.


XIDV

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.70%
6M
12.09%
YTD
13.30%
1Y
27.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VEU

1D
0.40%
1M
0.12%
6M
10.61%
YTD
14.22%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIDV vs. VEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XIDV and VEU is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.81

The correlation between XIDV and VEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

XIDV vs. VEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XIDV
VEU

Financial Services

33.5%
22.6%

Energy

11.1%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
4.9%

Industrials

8.7%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
8.0%

Basic Materials

7.8%
7.1%

Utilities

7.6%
3.0%

Healthcare

5.3%
6.7%

Communication Services

5.3%
4.5%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.9%

Technology

0.9%
21.6%

Financial Services

XIDV
33.5%
VEU
22.6%

Energy

XIDV
11.1%
VEU
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

XIDV
8.9%
VEU
4.9%

Industrials

XIDV
8.7%
VEU
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XIDV
8.5%
VEU
8.0%

Basic Materials

XIDV
7.8%
VEU
7.1%

Utilities

XIDV
7.6%
VEU
3.0%

Healthcare

XIDV
5.3%
VEU
6.7%

Communication Services

XIDV
5.3%
VEU
4.5%

Real Estate

XIDV
2.1%
VEU
1.9%

Technology

XIDV
0.9%
VEU
21.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIDV vs. VEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIDV
XIDV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIDV vs. VEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIDVVEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

2.38

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.52

8.99

+2.53

XIDV vs. VEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the VEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIDV and VEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIDV vs. VEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIDV drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum VEU drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDV and VEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIDVVEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-61.52%

+49.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-11.43%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-2.03%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-13.07%

+11.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

3.03%

-0.68%

Volatility

XIDV vs. VEU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) is 3.77%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that XIDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIDVVEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

6.16%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

14.64%

-4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.65%

16.56%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

16.29%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

17.03%

-2.38%

XIDV vs. VEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIDV has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VEU's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XIDV vs. VEU - Dividend Comparison

XIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than VEU's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
2.54%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%
XIDV
Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF
6.02%4.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIDV and VEU have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEU has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to XIDV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDV dropped -12.15% vs VEU's -61.52%.

On 1-year performance, VEU leads with 28.06% vs 27.53% for XIDV. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, XIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VEU has performed better with a 28.06% return vs 27.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XIDV.

XIDV has the higher dividend yield at 6.02%, compared with 2.54% for VEU.

XIDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index, while VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XIDV and 0.04% for VEU.

XIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIDV and VEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer