XIDV vs. FRDPX
XIDV (Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF) and FRDPX (Franklin Rising Dividends Fund) are both funds - XIDV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index, while FRDPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past year, XIDV returned 27.41% vs 15.62% for FRDPX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIDV charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FRDPX.
Performance
XIDV vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIDV achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly higher than FRDPX's 6.18% return.
XIDV
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRDPX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
XIDV vs. FRDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 10.22% | 40.30% |
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | 6.18% | 7.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIDV and FRDPX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between XIDV and FRDPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIDV vs. FRDPX — Risk / Return Rank
XIDV
FRDPX
XIDV vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIDV | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.27 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 2.21 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 8.61 | +3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIDV | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.55 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.55 | 0.61 | +1.94 |
Drawdowns
XIDV vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIDV drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum FRDPX drawdown of -51.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDV and FRDPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIDV | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -51.57% | +39.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.25% | -7.10% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | 0.00% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -5.81% | +4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 1.82% | +0.46% |
Volatility
XIDV vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) at 2.11%. This indicates that XIDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIDV | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 2.11% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 7.67% | +2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 10.14% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 15.36% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 17.17% | -2.37% |
XIDV vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIDV has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIDV vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison
XIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than FRDPX's 9.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | 9.63% | 10.25% | 10.15% | 4.60% | 4.96% | 4.42% | 0.82% | 3.01% | 5.20% | 0.90% | 3.09% | 5.30% |
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 4.32% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIDV and FRDPX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XIDV has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to FRDPX (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDV dropped -12.15% vs FRDPX's -51.57%.
XIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIDV and FRDPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer