PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIDV vs. FRDPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIDV vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIDV achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly higher than FRDPX's 6.18% return.


XIDV

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
10.22%
6M
13.84%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FRDPX

1D
0.51%
1M
2.25%
YTD
6.18%
6M
5.46%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIDV vs. FRDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XIDV and FRDPX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.56

The correlation between XIDV and FRDPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIDV vs. FRDPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIDV
XIDV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDPX
FRDPX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FRDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIDV vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XIDVFRDPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.27

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.21

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.07

8.61

+3.45

XIDV vs. FRDPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the FRDPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIDV and FRDPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XIDVFRDPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

1.55

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

0.61

+1.94

Drawdowns

XIDV vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIDV drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum FRDPX drawdown of -51.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDV and FRDPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIDVFRDPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-51.57%

+39.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-7.10%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

0.00%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-5.81%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.82%

+0.46%

Volatility

XIDV vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) at 2.11%. This indicates that XIDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIDVFRDPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

2.11%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

7.67%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

10.14%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

15.36%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

17.17%

-2.37%

XIDV vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIDV has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

XIDV vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison

XIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than FRDPX's 9.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
9.63%10.25%10.15%4.60%4.96%4.42%0.82%3.01%5.20%0.90%3.09%5.30%
XIDV
Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF
4.32%4.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIDV and FRDPX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XIDV has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to FRDPX (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDV dropped -12.15% vs FRDPX's -51.57%.

XIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIDV and FRDPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer