PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XID.TO vs. XEF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XID.TO vs. XEF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares India Index ETF (XID.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XID.TO achieves a -14.17% return, which is significantly lower than XEF.TO's 9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, XID.TO has underperformed XEF.TO with an annualized return of 6.69%, while XEF.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.77% annualized return.


XID.TO

1D
-0.95%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
-14.17%
6M
-14.49%
1Y
-13.67%
3Y*
2.43%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
6.69%

XEF.TO

1D
-0.41%
1M
5.38%
YTD
9.95%
6M
10.72%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
9.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XID.TO vs. XEF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XID.TO
iShares India Index ETF
-14.17%-0.28%12.36%14.07%-0.64%17.51%7.86%4.33%3.73%26.87%
XEF.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
9.95%25.69%12.04%15.21%-9.53%10.36%6.13%15.86%-6.65%18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between XID.TO and XEF.TO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2013

0.46

The correlation between XID.TO and XEF.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

XID.TO vs. XEF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XID.TO
XEF.TO

Financial Services

35.4%
22.9%

Energy

11.3%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
8.2%

Technology

8.5%
10.2%

Industrials

7.7%
20.5%

Basic Materials

7.3%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
6.4%

Communication Services

5.2%
4.4%

Healthcare

4.5%
9.8%

Utilities

3.0%
3.8%

Real Estate

-

3.1%

Financial Services

XID.TO
35.4%
XEF.TO
22.9%

Energy

XID.TO
11.3%
XEF.TO
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XID.TO
10.8%
XEF.TO
8.2%

Technology

XID.TO
8.5%
XEF.TO
10.2%

Industrials

XID.TO
7.7%
XEF.TO
20.5%

Basic Materials

XID.TO
7.3%
XEF.TO
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

XID.TO
6.2%
XEF.TO
6.4%

Communication Services

XID.TO
5.2%
XEF.TO
4.4%

Healthcare

XID.TO
4.5%
XEF.TO
9.8%

Utilities

XID.TO
3.0%
XEF.TO
3.8%

Real Estate

XID.TO

-

XEF.TO
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XID.TO vs. XEF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XID.TO
XID.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
XID.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XID.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
XID.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
XID.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
XID.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

XEF.TO
XEF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XEF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XID.TO vs. XEF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares India Index ETF (XID.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XID.TOXEF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.31

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

2.06

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.60

8.22

-9.82

XID.TO vs. XEF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XID.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the XEF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XID.TO and XEF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XID.TOXEF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

1.68

-2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.81

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.66

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.71

-0.38

Drawdowns

XID.TO vs. XEF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XID.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.26%, which is greater than XEF.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XID.TO and XEF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XID.TOXEF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.26%

-28.51%

-13.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.75%

-11.27%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-14.32%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-24.58%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.46%

-28.51%

-10.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.69%

-1.09%

-17.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.43%

-4.62%

-5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.57%

2.82%

+5.75%

Volatility

XID.TO vs. XEF.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares India Index ETF (XID.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) have volatilities of 4.96% and 4.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XID.TOXEF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

4.77%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

11.56%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

13.85%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

13.58%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

14.85%

+3.37%

XID.TO vs. XEF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XID.TO has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than XEF.TO's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

XID.TO vs. XEF.TO - Dividend Comparison

XID.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.69%, more than XEF.TO's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEF.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
2.21%2.43%2.76%2.75%2.93%2.42%1.93%2.72%2.76%2.10%2.42%2.42%
XID.TO
iShares India Index ETF
16.69%14.32%0.17%0.42%3.45%6.82%0.03%0.43%0.39%0.16%0.36%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


XID.TO and XEF.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEF.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEF.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for XID.TO.

XID.TO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XEF.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XID.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XEF.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index (CAD). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for XID.TO and 0.23% for XEF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XID.TO and XEF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer