PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYE vs. MTBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHYE vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYE achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's -0.23% return.


XHYE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
3.57%
6M
3.93%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
10Y*

MTBA

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
0.18%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHYE vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XHYE
BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF
3.57%6.73%7.46%3.23%
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
-0.23%7.74%1.99%3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XHYE and MTBA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023

0.44

XHYE vs. MTBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XHYE
MTBA

Energy

49.2%

-

Technology

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

47.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XHYE
49.2%
MTBA

-

Technology

XHYE
0.3%
MTBA

-

Basic Materials

XHYE

-

MTBA

-

Communication Services

XHYE

-

MTBA

-

Consumer Cyclical

XHYE

-

MTBA

-

Consumer Defensive

XHYE

-

MTBA

-

Financial Services

XHYE

-

MTBA
47.2%

Healthcare

XHYE

-

MTBA

-

Industrials

XHYE

-

MTBA

-

Real Estate

XHYE

-

MTBA

-

Utilities

XHYE

-

MTBA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHYE vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYE
XHYE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XHYE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

MTBA
MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYE vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYEMTBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.32

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.50

1.84

+6.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.98

6.28

+20.70

XHYE vs. MTBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYE Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the MTBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYE and MTBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYEMTBADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

1.68

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.30

-0.46

Drawdowns

XHYE vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYE drawdown since its inception was -8.87%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYE and MTBA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYEMTBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-3.48%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.21%

-2.82%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-1.60%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-0.79%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

0.83%

-0.45%

Volatility

XHYE vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE) is 0.56%, while Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that XHYE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHYEMTBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

1.33%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.98%

2.47%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

3.10%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.60%

3.95%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.60%

3.95%

+3.65%

XHYE vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHYE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHYE vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

XHYE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, less than MTBA's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
6.09%5.98%6.03%0.48%0.00%
XHYE
BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF
5.79%6.55%7.04%6.46%5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHYE and MTBA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTBA has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to XHYE (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYE dropped -8.87% vs MTBA's -3.48%.

On 1-year performance, XHYE leads with 9.25% vs 5.18% for MTBA. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XHYE has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XHYE has performed better with a 9.25% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYE.

MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 5.79% for XHYE.

XHYE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MTBA is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYE and 0.15% for MTBA.

XHYE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHYE and MTBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer