PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYD vs. XCCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHYD vs. XCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly higher than XCCC's -0.05% return.


XHYD

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.85%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
10Y*

XCCC

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.38%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
10.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHYD vs. XCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XHYD
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF
0.44%8.33%6.29%11.75%-2.18%
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
-0.05%7.25%13.01%20.57%-5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XHYD and XCCC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between XHYD and XCCC has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XHYD vs. XCCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XHYD
XCCC

Consumer Defensive

29.7%
0.9%

Utilities

23.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
1.8%

Financial Services

2.0%
0.7%

Industrials

1.8%
3.7%

Basic Materials

1.0%
3.2%

Communication Services

-

12.8%

Energy

-

3.9%

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Real Estate

-

3.7%

Technology

-

2.8%

Consumer Defensive

XHYD
29.7%
XCCC
0.9%

Utilities

XHYD
23.8%
XCCC

-

Consumer Cyclical

XHYD
9.7%
XCCC
1.8%

Financial Services

XHYD
2.0%
XCCC
0.7%

Industrials

XHYD
1.8%
XCCC
3.7%

Basic Materials

XHYD
1.0%
XCCC
3.2%

Communication Services

XHYD

-

XCCC
12.8%

Energy

XHYD

-

XCCC
3.9%

Healthcare

XHYD

-

XCCC
3.2%

Real Estate

XHYD

-

XCCC
3.7%

Technology

XHYD

-

XCCC
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHYD vs. XCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYD
XHYD Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XHYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYD Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYD Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

XCCC
XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYD vs. XCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYDXCCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.20

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.11

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.53

3.72

+6.81

XHYD vs. XCCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the XCCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYD and XCCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYDXCCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.09

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.96

-0.29

Drawdowns

XHYD vs. XCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYD drawdown since its inception was -11.02%, roughly equal to the maximum XCCC drawdown of -10.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYD and XCCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYDXCCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-10.99%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-5.11%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-10.99%

+7.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-1.05%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-1.93%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

1.53%

-0.97%

Volatility

XHYD vs. XCCC - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) at 1.51%. This indicates that XHYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHYDXCCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

1.51%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

4.02%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

5.25%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.15%

8.82%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.15%

8.82%

-1.67%

XHYD vs. XCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XCCC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHYD vs. XCCC - Dividend Comparison

XHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than XCCC's 10.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
10.05%10.06%10.68%12.05%7.63%
XHYD
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF
5.31%5.83%6.32%5.80%5.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHYD and XCCC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XHYD has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to XCCC (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYD dropped -11.02% vs XCCC's -10.99%.

On 3-year performance, XCCC leads with 10.79% vs 7.51% for XHYD. On fees, XHYD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XCCC has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XCCC has performed better with a 10.79% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XHYD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XCCC.

XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.05%, compared with 5.31% for XHYD.

XHYD tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical, while XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYD and 0.40% for XCCC.

XHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHYD and XCCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer