PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYC vs. XCCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XHYC vs. XCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XHYC vs. XCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XHYC
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF
-0.61%6.80%7.99%15.00%-4.48%
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
-2.95%7.25%13.01%20.57%-5.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYC achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly higher than XCCC's -2.95% return.


XHYC

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
-0.61%
6M
0.61%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
10Y*

XCCC

1D
1.20%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
-2.95%
6M
-2.98%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XHYC vs. XCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHYC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XCCC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XHYC vs. XCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYC
XHYC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XHYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XCCC
XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYC vs. XCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYCXCCCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

0.63

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

0.90

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.16

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

0.70

+0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.73

3.09

+4.64

XHYC vs. XCCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYC Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the XCCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYC and XCCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYCXCCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

0.63

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.90

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between XHYC and XCCC is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XHYC vs. XCCC - Dividend Comparison

XHYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, less than XCCC's 10.23% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
XHYC
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF
6.66%6.64%6.71%6.48%5.78%
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
10.23%10.06%10.68%12.05%7.63%

Drawdowns

XHYC vs. XCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYC drawdown since its inception was -13.72%, which is greater than XCCC's maximum drawdown of -10.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYC and XCCC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYCXCCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.72%

-10.99%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-8.25%

+4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-3.93%

+2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-1.95%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

1.87%

-1.08%

Volatility

XHYC vs. XCCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) is 1.48%, while BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that XHYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XHYCXCCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

2.84%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

4.10%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50%

9.63%

-5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.55%

8.95%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.55%

8.95%

-1.40%