XHYC vs. SKOR
Compare and contrast key facts about BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR).
XHYC and SKOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XHYC is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Cyclical Index. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. SKOR is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2014. Both XHYC and SKOR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XHYC vs. SKOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XHYC vs. SKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYC BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF | -0.61% | 6.80% | 7.99% | 15.00% | -9.00% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | -0.28% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -6.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYC achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than SKOR's -0.28% return.
XHYC
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SKOR
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XHYC vs. SKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SKOR's 0.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XHYC vs. SKOR — Risk / Return Rank
XHYC
SKOR
XHYC vs. SKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYC | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.66 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 2.32 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 2.45 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.73 | 9.56 | -1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYC | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.66 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.62 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYC and SKOR is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XHYC vs. SKOR - Dividend Comparison
XHYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than SKOR's 4.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYC BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF | 6.66% | 6.64% | 6.71% | 6.48% | 5.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.71% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
Drawdowns
XHYC vs. SKOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYC drawdown since its inception was -13.72%, smaller than the maximum SKOR drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYC and SKOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYC | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -15.98% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.81% | -2.23% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -1.39% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -2.68% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.57% | +0.22% |
Volatility
XHYC vs. SKOR - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) at 1.34%. This indicates that XHYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XHYC | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 1.34% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.29% | 1.86% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.50% | 3.28% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 4.41% | +3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 4.91% | +2.64% |