XHS vs. FTXH
XHS (SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF) and FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XHS tracks the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index while FTXH tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XHS returned 0.44%/yr vs 7.80%/yr for FTXH. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXH.
Performance
XHS vs. FTXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHS achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly higher than FTXH's 5.00% return.
XHS
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 6.32%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- 1Y
- 16.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.46%
FTXH
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 6.02%
- 1Y
- 36.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- —
XHS vs. FTXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 6.32% | 18.83% | 1.76% | 5.15% | -19.87% | 9.76% | 33.66% | 18.81% | 1.96% | 17.65% |
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 5.00% | 24.15% | 2.98% | -1.41% | 2.55% | 6.14% | 11.73% | 22.13% | -9.51% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHS and FTXH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.55 |
The correlation between XHS and FTXH shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XHS vs. FTXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHS
FTXH
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XHS
FTXH
Financial Services
XHS
FTXH
-
Basic Materials
XHS
-
FTXH
-
Communication Services
XHS
-
FTXH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHS
-
FTXH
-
Consumer Defensive
XHS
-
FTXH
-
Energy
XHS
-
FTXH
-
Industrials
XHS
-
FTXH
-
Real Estate
XHS
-
FTXH
-
Technology
XHS
-
FTXH
-
Utilities
XHS
-
FTXH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHS vs. FTXH — Risk / Return Rank
XHS
FTXH
XHS vs. FTXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHS | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.37 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 4.87 | -3.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 14.07 | -10.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHS | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 2.14 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.48 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.38 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
XHS vs. FTXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHS drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, which is greater than FTXH's maximum drawdown of -32.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHS and FTXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHS | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -32.11% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.99% | -7.47% | -4.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -19.51% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.62% | -19.51% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -2.88% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -5.84% | -4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 2.58% | +1.75% |
Volatility
XHS vs. FTXH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHS | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 4.83% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 11.73% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.56% | 16.98% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 16.31% | +4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 18.41% | +3.99% |
XHS vs. FTXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXH's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHS vs. FTXH - Dividend Comparison
XHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than FTXH's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.22% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 0.25% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 2.37% | 0.34% | 0.22% | 0.28% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHS and FTXH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXH has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to XHS (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHS dropped -39.32% vs FTXH's -32.11%.
On 5-year performance, FTXH leads with 7.80% vs 0.44% for XHS. On fees, XHS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXH has performed better with a 7.80% return vs 0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXH.
FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.25% for XHS.
XHS tracks S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index, while FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHS and 0.60% for FTXH.
FTXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHS and FTXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer