XHLF vs. TLTX
XHLF (BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. XHLF is passively managed, while TLTX is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. XHLF charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
XHLF vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -0.36% return.
XHLF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -1.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHLF vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 1.39% | 2.01% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | -0.36% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHLF and TLTX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHLF vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
XHLF
TLTX
XHLF vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHLF | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 11.75 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 98.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 670.31 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHLF | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 10.75 | 0.63 | +10.12 |
Drawdowns
XHLF vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHLF | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -6.35% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.05% | +4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -2.27% | +2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | — | — |
Volatility
XHLF vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHLF | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32% | 9.14% | -8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.42% | 9.14% | -8.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.42% | 9.14% | -8.72% |
XHLF vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHLF vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than TLTX's 15.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 15.79% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 3.85% | 3.98% | 4.96% | 4.50% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHLF and TLTX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 15.79%, compared with 3.85% for XHLF.
They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XHLF and 0.29% for TLTX.
Find the right allocation for XHLF and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer