PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHLF vs. TLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHLF vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -3.02% return.


XHLF

1D
0.03%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.72%
YTD
1.99%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.39%

TLTX

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.42%
6M
-2.60%
YTD
-3.02%
1Y
-0.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$182.44K$196.39K$333.12K
$12.43M$15.71M$17.34M

XHLF vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XHLF and TLTX is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHLF vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XHLF
XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTX
TLTX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XHLF vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XHLFTLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+12.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+41.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

10.26

1.00

+9.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

94.58

-0.09

+94.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

614.05

-0.19

+614.23

XHLF vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHLF Sharpe Ratio is 12.33, which is higher than the TLTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHLF and TLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XHLF vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and TLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHLFTLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-6.70%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.04%

-6.70%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.60%

+6.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-2.51%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

3.06%

-3.05%

Volatility

XHLF vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.09%, while Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHLFTLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

2.91%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.22%

7.29%

-7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31%

9.46%

-9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.41%

9.42%

-9.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.41%

9.42%

-9.01%

XHLF vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHLF vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than TLTX's 19.28% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TLTX
Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF
19.28%7.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
3.81%3.98%4.96%4.50%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHLF and TLTX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to XHLF (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHLF dropped -0.11% vs TLTX's -6.70%.

On 1-year performance, XHLF leads with 3.75% vs -0.57% for TLTX. On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XHLF has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XHLF has performed better with a 3.75% return vs -0.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 19.28%, compared with 3.81% for XHLF.

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XHLF and 0.29% for TLTX.

XHLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.33 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHLF and TLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer