XHLF vs. DCMT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XHLF (BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHLF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. XHLF is passively managed, while DCMT is actively managed. Over the past year, XHLF returned 3.75% vs 30.61% for DCMT. Their -0.16 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. XHLF charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

XHLF vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 26.14% return.

XHLF

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 1.72%
• YTD: 1.99%
• 1Y: 3.75%
• 3Y*: 4.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.39%

DCMT

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 7.21%
• 6M: 20.26%
• YTD: 26.14%
• 1Y: 30.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	$312.97K	$269.09K	$196.68K
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	$12.43M	$15.71M	$17.34M

XHLF vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	1.99%	4.21%	4.69%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	26.14%	6.04%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XHLF and DCMT is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	-0.16

Return for Risk

XHLF vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XHLF

XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 58
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 61
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XHLF vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XHLF	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	12.33	1.62	+10.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	41.64	2.22	+39.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	10.26	1.28	+8.98
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	94.58	1.93	+92.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	614.05	6.43	+607.62

XHLF vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHLF Sharpe Ratio is 12.33, which is higher than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHLF and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XHLF vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XHLF	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	-15.96%	+15.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.04%	-15.96%	+15.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.46%	+9.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-3.62%	+3.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	4.78%	-4.77%

Volatility

XHLF vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.09%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XHLF	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	5.66%	-5.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.22%	17.01%	-16.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31%	19.04%	-18.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.41%	16.05%	-15.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.41%	16.05%	-15.64%

XHLF vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHLF vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than DCMT's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.91%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	3.81%	3.98%	4.96%	4.50%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XHLF and DCMT in my portfolio?

XHLF and DCMT have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XHLF or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to XHLF (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHLF dropped -0.11% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, XHLF or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 30.61% vs 3.75% for XHLF. On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XHLF has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XHLF or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 30.61% return vs 3.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XHLF or DCMT?

XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XHLF or DCMT?

XHLF has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.91% for DCMT.

What is the main difference between XHLF and DCMT?

XHLF is categorized as Government Bonds, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XHLF and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XHLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.33 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.