PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHLF vs. BNDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XHLF vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XHLF vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
0.78%4.21%5.04%4.90%0.96%
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.43%-8.17%-6.65%4.02%-4.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 3.43% return.


XHLF

1D
0.01%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.78%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
10Y*

BNDD

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
3.43%
6M
0.20%
1Y
-5.98%
3Y*
-4.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XHLF vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XHLF vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHLF
XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDD
BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHLF vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHLFBNDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

12.09

-0.49

+12.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

39.75

-0.58

+40.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

9.67

0.93

+8.75

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

99.61

-0.45

+100.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

605.40

-0.68

+606.07

XHLF vs. BNDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHLF Sharpe Ratio is 12.09, which is higher than the BNDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHLF and BNDD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHLFBNDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09

-0.49

+12.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.74

-0.35

+11.09

Correlation

The correlation between XHLF and BNDD is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

XHLF vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison

XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than BNDD's 3.63% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
3.88%3.98%4.96%4.50%0.86%0.00%
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.63%3.82%3.85%4.30%43.17%1.04%

Drawdowns

XHLF vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and BNDD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XHLFBNDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-30.87%

+30.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.04%

-10.93%

+10.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-27.13%

+27.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-19.04%

+19.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

7.27%

-7.26%

Volatility

XHLF vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.09%, while Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XHLFBNDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

3.47%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.21%

8.07%

-7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33%

12.39%

-12.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.42%

13.55%

-13.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.42%

13.55%

-13.13%