XGSI.L vs. XCX6.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L).
XGSI.L and XCX6.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGSI.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2017. XCX6.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 24, 2010. Both XGSI.L and XCX6.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XGSI.L vs. XCX6.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XGSI.L vs. XCX6.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGSI.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged | -0.36% | 3.99% | 1.24% | 5.84% | -13.31% | -2.49% | 5.86% | 7.44% | 2.26% | 0.95% |
XCX6.L Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | -7.12% | 31.66% | 18.56% | -12.72% | -22.62% | -21.96% | 28.87% | 22.27% | -19.13% | 33.84% |
Different Trading Currencies
XGSI.L is traded in USD, while XCX6.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XCX6.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGSI.L achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than XCX6.L's -7.12% return.
XGSI.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 2.55%
- 5Y*
- -0.67%
- 10Y*
- —
XCX6.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- -7.12%
- 6M
- -14.11%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- -5.52%
- 10Y*
- 4.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGSI.L vs. XCX6.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGSI.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX6.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XGSI.L vs. XCX6.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGSI.L
XCX6.L
XGSI.L vs. XCX6.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGSI.L | XCX6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 0.20 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 0.41 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.05 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 0.30 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | 0.80 | +1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGSI.L | XCX6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.20 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | -0.19 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.10 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between XGSI.L and XCX6.L is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
XGSI.L vs. XCX6.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGSI.L nor XCX6.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XGSI.L vs. XCX6.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGSI.L drawdown since its inception was -17.29%, smaller than the maximum XCX6.L drawdown of -62.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSI.L and XCX6.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGSI.L | XCX6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.29% | -57.08% | +39.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.64% | -16.43% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.39% | -50.24% | +33.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -33.06% | +26.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -20.78% | +15.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 6.48% | -5.55% |
Volatility
XGSI.L vs. XCX6.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) is 1.50%, while Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that XGSI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX6.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XGSI.L | XCX6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 6.15% | -4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.95% | 13.76% | -10.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.48% | 22.14% | -17.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 29.43% | -24.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 26.26% | -21.50% |