XGSI.L vs. AEGG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L).
XGSI.L and AEGG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGSI.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2017. AEGG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Dec 3, 2021. Both XGSI.L and AEGG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XGSI.L vs. AEGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XGSI.L vs. AEGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGSI.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged | -0.36% | 3.99% | 1.24% | 5.84% | -13.31% | -1.02% |
AEGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | -1.19% | 12.24% | 1.35% | 11.22% | -21.88% | 1.25% |
Different Trading Currencies
XGSI.L is traded in USD, while AEGG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the AEGG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGSI.L achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than AEGG.L's -1.19% return.
XGSI.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 2.55%
- 5Y*
- -0.67%
- 10Y*
- —
AEGG.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGSI.L vs. AEGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGSI.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AEGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XGSI.L vs. AEGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGSI.L
AEGG.L
XGSI.L vs. AEGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGSI.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 0.72 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 1.08 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.02 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | 2.62 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGSI.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.72 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | -0.02 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between XGSI.L and AEGG.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XGSI.L vs. AEGG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGSI.L nor AEGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XGSI.L vs. AEGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGSI.L drawdown since its inception was -17.29%, smaller than the maximum AEGG.L drawdown of -31.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSI.L and AEGG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGSI.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.29% | -15.75% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.64% | -2.38% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -1.91% | -4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -7.77% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.67% | +0.26% |
Volatility
XGSI.L vs. AEGG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) is 1.50%, while iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that XGSI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XGSI.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 3.04% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.95% | 5.32% | -2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.48% | 8.66% | -4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 11.04% | -5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 11.04% | -6.28% |