XGSI.L vs. XBGG.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged (XBGG.L).

XGSI.L and XBGG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGSI.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2017. XBGG.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Apr 19, 2016. Both XGSI.L and XBGG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XGSI.L vs. XBGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged (XBGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XGSI.L vs. XBGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XGSI.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged	-0.36%	3.99%	1.24%	5.84%	-13.31%	-2.49%	5.86%	7.44%	2.26%	0.95%
XBGG.L Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged	-1.31%	12.49%	0.49%	11.32%	-22.60%	-2.43%	7.45%	10.96%	-5.95%	6.44%

Different Trading Currencies

XGSI.L is traded in USD, while XBGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XBGG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGSI.L achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than XBGG.L's -1.31% return.

XGSI.L

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -1.54%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: 2.35%
• 3Y*: 2.55%
• 5Y*: -0.67%
• 10Y*: —

XBGG.L

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -2.17%
• YTD: -1.31%
• 6M: -0.65%
• 1Y: 6.21%
• 3Y*: 5.86%
• 5Y*: -1.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGSI.L vs. XBGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGSI.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XBGG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XGSI.L

Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged

XBGG.L

Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged

Return for Risk

XGSI.L vs. XBGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGSI.L

XGSI.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
XGSI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
XGSI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XGSI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
XGSI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
XGSI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 28

XBGG.L

XBGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
XBGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XBGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
XBGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
XBGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
XBGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGSI.L vs. XBGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged (XBGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XGSI.L	XBGG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	0.71	-0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	1.07	-0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.13	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	1.05	-0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.56	2.73	-0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XGSI.L vs. XBGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGSI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is comparable to the XBGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGSI.L and XBGG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XGSI.L	XBGG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	0.71	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	-0.10	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.00	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between XGSI.L and XBGG.L is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XGSI.L vs. XBGG.L - Dividend Comparison

XGSI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XGSI.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XBGG.L Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged	2.86%	2.93%	3.04%	2.00%	2.76%	0.79%	1.35%	1.72%	1.42%

Drawdowns

XGSI.L vs. XBGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGSI.L drawdown since its inception was -17.29%, smaller than the maximum XBGG.L drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSI.L and XBGG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XGSI.L	XBGG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.29%	-17.06%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.64%	-2.60%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.39%	-16.89%	+0.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.48%	-3.89%	-2.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.67%	-4.82%	-0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	0.74%	+0.19%

Volatility

XGSI.L vs. XBGG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) is 1.50%, while Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 3D GBP hedged (XBGG.L) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that XGSI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XGSI.L	XBGG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.50%	3.26%	-1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.95%	5.58%	-2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.48%	8.76%	-4.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.24%	10.63%	-5.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.76%	10.77%	-6.01%