XGLS.L vs. XDWH.L
XGLS.L (Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XGLS.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (GBP Hedged), while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGLS.L returned 11.69%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XDWH.L. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. XGLS.L charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.L.
Performance
XGLS.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGLS.L is traded in GBp, while XDWH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLS.L achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.35% return. Over the past 10 years, XGLS.L has outperformed XDWH.L with an annualized return of 11.69%, while XDWH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.66% annualized return.
XGLS.L
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 30.74%
- 3Y*
- 29.56%
- 5Y*
- 16.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- 12.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
XGLS.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLS.L Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC | 2.29% | 63.07% | 24.85% | 11.63% | -1.63% | -4.91% | 22.11% | 15.69% | -3.62% | 9.65% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.35% | 7.04% | 2.51% | -1.38% | 5.83% | 21.71% | 9.57% | 18.28% | 7.59% | 9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLS.L and XDWH.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLS.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGLS.L
XDWH.L
XGLS.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGLS.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.16 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.21 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 3.15 | +1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGLS.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.86 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.40 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.56 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.59 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
XGLS.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLS.L drawdown since its inception was -46.55%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLS.L and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLS.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.55% | -18.80% | -27.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.19% | -10.43% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.19% | -18.80% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -18.80% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.99% | -18.80% | -4.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.80% | -5.80% | -11.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.38% | -4.41% | -18.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 4.01% | +2.90% |
Volatility
XGLS.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) at 5.30%. This indicates that XGLS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLS.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 5.30% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.82% | 10.98% | +10.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.79% | 14.58% | +10.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 14.02% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 15.50% | +0.02% |
XGLS.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLS.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGLS.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLS.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGLS.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for XGLS.L.
XGLS.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XGLS.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for XGLS.L and 0.25% for XDWH.L.
Find the right allocation for XGLS.L and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer