XDWH.L vs. XLV
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV).
XDWH.L and XLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWH.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. XLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Health Care Select Sector. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both XDWH.L and XLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDWH.L or XLV.
Key characteristics
| XDWH.L | XLV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.44% | 8.88% |
| 1Y Return | 15.32% | 16.65% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.96% | 4.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.74% | 10.45% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.43 | 1.66 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.92 | 2.33 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.30 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.68 | 2.11 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.28 | 7.20 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.58% | 2.42% |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.71% | 10.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.24% | -39.18% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.33% | -6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.L and XLV is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XDWH.L vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.L achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's 8.88% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDWH.L vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWH.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDWH.L vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDWH.L vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
XDWH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.58% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% | 1.35% | 1.52% |
Drawdowns
XDWH.L vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.L drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.L and XLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDWH.L vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) is 2.29%, while Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that XDWH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.