PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGLE.L vs. DBJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGLE.L vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGLE.L is traded in EUR, while DBJP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DBJP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGLE.L achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 18.96% return. Over the past 10 years, XGLE.L has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of -0.35%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.


XGLE.L

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.07%
6M
0.14%
1Y
0.33%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
-2.29%
10Y*
-0.35%

DBJP

1D
-2.72%
1M
3.64%
YTD
18.96%
6M
19.61%
1Y
48.58%
3Y*
23.87%
5Y*
21.98%
10Y*
15.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGLE.L vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.07%0.57%1.68%6.80%-18.23%-3.63%4.76%6.62%0.78%-0.04%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
18.96%14.14%33.82%32.12%1.75%21.50%1.42%23.60%-10.82%6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between XGLE.L and DBJP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011

-0.05

The correlation between XGLE.L and DBJP shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGLE.L vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGLE.L
XGLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGLE.L vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGLE.LDBJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.45

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

5.73

-5.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.04

21.50

-21.54

XGLE.L vs. DBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the DBJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGLE.L and DBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGLE.LDBJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

2.54

-2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

1.11

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.76

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.69

-0.28

Drawdowns

XGLE.L vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGLE.L drawdown since its inception was -22.56%, smaller than the maximum DBJP drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLE.L and DBJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGLE.LDBJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.56%

-32.54%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.54%

-8.53%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.99%

-22.38%

+18.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-22.38%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.56%

-32.54%

+9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.20%

-2.72%

-11.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-7.21%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

2.27%

-0.89%

Volatility

XGLE.L vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) is 1.70%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that XGLE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGLE.LDBJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

4.11%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.52%

13.79%

-10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

19.23%

-15.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.34%

19.93%

-13.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.34%

20.85%

-15.51%

XGLE.L vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XGLE.L vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

XGLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
2.41%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGLE.L and DBJP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

XGLE.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while DBJP is Japan Equities. XGLE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XGLE.L and 0.45% for DBJP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGLE.L and DBJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer