XGLD.L vs. AUCP.L
XGLD.L (Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC) and AUCP.L (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both Gold funds - XGLD.L tracks the Gold while AUCP.L tracks the STOXX Global Gold Miners. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGLD.L returned 11.49%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for AUCP.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XGLD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AUCP.L.
Performance
XGLD.L vs. AUCP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGLD.L is traded in USD, while AUCP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AUCP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLD.L achieves a -6.12% return, which is significantly higher than AUCP.L's -15.27% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XGLD.L having a 11.49% annualized return and AUCP.L not far ahead at 11.97%.
XGLD.L
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -12.51%
- YTD
- -6.12%
- 1Y
- 21.12%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 17.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
AUCP.L
- 1D
- -3.38%
- 1M
- -14.87%
- 6M
- -23.99%
- YTD
- -15.27%
- 1Y
- 47.18%
- 3Y*
- 41.06%
- 5Y*
- 21.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
XGLD.L vs. AUCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLD.L Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC | -6.12% | 64.60% | 25.87% | 13.37% | -0.24% | -4.19% | 24.11% | 18.35% | -1.36% | 11.68% |
AUCP.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | -15.27% | 181.76% | 18.19% | 14.43% | -14.30% | -9.74% | 21.20% | 45.13% | -10.97% | 10.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLD.L and AUCP.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2010 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XGLD.L and AUCP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLD.L vs. AUCP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGLD.L
AUCP.L
XGLD.L vs. AUCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XGLD.L | AUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 1.25 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.08 | 2.91 | -0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XGLD.L vs. AUCP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, smaller than the maximum AUCP.L drawdown of -82.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLD.L and AUCP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLD.L | AUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.34% | -82.34% | +37.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.53% | -37.45% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -37.45% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -49.52% | +24.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.53% | -54.94% | +30.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.91% | -36.77% | +12.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -52.10% | +33.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.12% | 16.18% | -6.06% |
Volatility
XGLD.L vs. AUCP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) is 7.34%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) has a volatility of 15.51%. This indicates that XGLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLD.L | AUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 15.51% | -8.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.02% | 38.77% | -15.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.36% | 49.17% | -22.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 42.08% | -24.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 38.06% | -22.41% |
XGLD.L vs. AUCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AUCP.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGLD.L vs. AUCP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLD.L nor AUCP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGLD.L and AUCP.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGLD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGLD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AUCP.L.
XGLD.L tracks Gold, while AUCP.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XGLD.L and 0.55% for AUCP.L.
Find the right allocation for XGLD.L and AUCP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer