XGLD.L vs. G2XJ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE).
XGLD.L and G2XJ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGLD.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Jun 15, 2010. G2XJ.DE is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners. It was launched on Mar 25, 2015. Both XGLD.L and G2XJ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XGLD.L vs. G2XJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XGLD.L vs. G2XJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLD.L Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC | 10.73% | 64.60% | 25.87% | 13.37% | -0.24% | -4.19% | 24.11% | 18.35% | -1.36% | 11.68% |
G2XJ.DE VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS | 8.38% | 181.76% | 14.51% | 6.92% | -11.26% | -22.21% | 30.36% | 40.16% | -13.27% | 1.62% |
Different Trading Currencies
XGLD.L is traded in USD, while G2XJ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the G2XJ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLD.L achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than G2XJ.DE's 8.38% return. Over the past 10 years, XGLD.L has underperformed G2XJ.DE with an annualized return of 14.39%, while G2XJ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 18.14% annualized return.
XGLD.L
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- -10.25%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 6M
- 23.48%
- 1Y
- 52.25%
- 3Y*
- 33.77%
- 5Y*
- 22.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.39%
G2XJ.DE
- 1D
- 8.70%
- 1M
- -15.93%
- YTD
- 8.38%
- 6M
- 30.52%
- 1Y
- 127.88%
- 3Y*
- 50.23%
- 5Y*
- 24.31%
- 10Y*
- 18.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGLD.L vs. G2XJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than G2XJ.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XGLD.L vs. G2XJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGLD.L
G2XJ.DE
XGLD.L vs. G2XJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGLD.L | G2XJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 2.60 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.81 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 4.21 | -1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 13.82 | -2.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGLD.L | G2XJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.60 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.31 | 0.62 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.45 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.43 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLD.L and G2XJ.DE is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XGLD.L vs. G2XJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLD.L nor G2XJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XGLD.L vs. G2XJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.19%, smaller than the maximum G2XJ.DE drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLD.L and G2XJ.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLD.L | G2XJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.19% | -49.96% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -29.24% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.06% | -40.82% | +19.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.21% | -49.96% | +28.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.25% | -15.55% | +5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.06% | -25.33% | +6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 8.84% | -4.24% |
Volatility
XGLD.L vs. G2XJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) is 11.87%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a volatility of 20.22%. This indicates that XGLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G2XJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XGLD.L | G2XJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.87% | 20.22% | -8.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.29% | 40.47% | -18.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.04% | 48.84% | -22.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 38.84% | -21.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 39.77% | -24.44% |