XGIU.L vs. R2SC.L
XGIU.L (Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C) and R2SC.L (SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XGIU.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while R2SC.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGIU.L returned 1.97%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for R2SC.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGIU.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for R2SC.L.
Performance
XGIU.L vs. R2SC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGIU.L is traded in GBp, while R2SC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the R2SC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGIU.L achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than R2SC.L's 18.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XGIU.L has underperformed R2SC.L with an annualized return of 1.97%, while R2SC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.
XGIU.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 0.78%
- 5Y*
- -1.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.97%
R2SC.L
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 18.02%
- 6M
- 15.96%
- 1Y
- 42.36%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
XGIU.L vs. R2SC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGIU.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C | 1.28% | 1.16% | -1.40% | -0.59% | -12.25% | 3.51% | 7.89% | 4.14% | 3.71% | 1.12% |
R2SC.L SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 18.02% | 4.66% | 11.86% | 12.18% | -11.55% | 15.87% | 15.73% | 20.67% | -7.45% | 4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGIU.L and R2SC.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2016 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGIU.L vs. R2SC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGIU.L
R2SC.L
XGIU.L vs. R2SC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) and SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGIU.L | R2SC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.41 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 4.88 | -3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.05 | 14.39 | -11.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGIU.L | R2SC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 2.46 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.36 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.55 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.55 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
XGIU.L vs. R2SC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGIU.L drawdown since its inception was -20.08%, smaller than the maximum R2SC.L drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGIU.L and R2SC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGIU.L | R2SC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.08% | -35.03% | +14.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.97% | -8.63% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.40% | -30.00% | +24.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.08% | -30.00% | +9.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.08% | -35.03% | +14.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.69% | -0.06% | -14.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.04% | -8.51% | -2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 2.94% | -1.38% |
Volatility
XGIU.L vs. R2SC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) is 2.42%, while SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that XGIU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than R2SC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGIU.L | R2SC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 5.17% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.99% | 11.78% | -7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.10% | 17.18% | -12.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.96% | 20.07% | -11.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 20.78% | -9.14% |
XGIU.L vs. R2SC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGIU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than R2SC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGIU.L vs. R2SC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGIU.L nor R2SC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGIU.L and R2SC.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGIU.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGIU.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for R2SC.L.
XGIU.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while R2SC.L is Small Cap Blend Equities. XGIU.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while R2SC.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XGIU.L and 0.30% for R2SC.L.
Find the right allocation for XGIU.L and R2SC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer