XGIU.L vs. TI5G.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L).

XGIU.L and TI5G.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGIU.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD. It was launched on Aug 14, 2013. TI5G.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. It was launched on Mar 5, 2018. Both XGIU.L and TI5G.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XGIU.L vs. TI5G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XGIU.L vs. TI5G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XGIU.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C	1.26%	1.16%	-1.40%	-0.59%	-12.25%	3.51%	7.89%	4.14%	5.73%
TI5G.L iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)	1.08%	5.70%	4.60%	3.62%	-3.69%	5.28%	4.05%	3.05%	-0.77%

Different Trading Currencies

XGIU.L is traded in GBp, while TI5G.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TI5G.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGIU.L achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than TI5G.L's 1.08% return.

XGIU.L

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -1.66%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 1.81%
• 3Y*: -0.32%
• 5Y*: -0.95%
• 10Y*: —

TI5G.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 3.65%
• 3Y*: 4.42%
• 5Y*: 3.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGIU.L vs. TI5G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGIU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TI5G.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XGIU.L

Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C

TI5G.L

iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)

Return for Risk

XGIU.L vs. TI5G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGIU.L

XGIU.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
XGIU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XGIU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
XGIU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XGIU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
XGIU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

TI5G.L

TI5G.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
TI5G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TI5G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TI5G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TI5G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
TI5G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGIU.L vs. TI5G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XGIU.L	TI5G.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	1.09	-0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	1.49	-0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.22	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	2.43	-1.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.20	7.90	-6.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XGIU.L vs. TI5G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGIU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the TI5G.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGIU.L and TI5G.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XGIU.L	TI5G.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34	1.09	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.99	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.86	-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between XGIU.L and TI5G.L is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XGIU.L vs. TI5G.L - Dividend Comparison

XGIU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TI5G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XGIU.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TI5G.L iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)	5.91%	5.98%	6.83%	5.19%	0.32%	0.34%	3.06%	3.28%	2.36%

Drawdowns

XGIU.L vs. TI5G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGIU.L drawdown since its inception was -20.08%, which is greater than TI5G.L's maximum drawdown of -5.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGIU.L and TI5G.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XGIU.L	TI5G.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.08%	-5.63%	-14.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.29%	-1.55%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.08%	-5.63%	-14.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.70%	-0.36%	-14.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.92%	-1.04%	-9.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	0.48%	+1.63%

Volatility

XGIU.L vs. TI5G.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) at 0.90%. This indicates that XGIU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TI5G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XGIU.L	TI5G.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.02%	0.90%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.51%	1.68%	+1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.49%	3.35%	+2.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.06%	3.07%	+5.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.79%	3.25%	+8.54%