PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGIU.L vs. GILE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XGIU.L vs. GILE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (GILE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XGIU.L vs. GILE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XGIU.L
Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C
1.26%1.16%-1.40%-0.59%-12.25%3.51%7.89%4.14%3.71%0.69%
GILE.L
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.73%7.76%-6.57%-0.11%-14.94%-1.55%13.63%-0.20%-1.86%2.12%
Different Trading Currencies

XGIU.L is traded in GBp, while GILE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the GILE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGIU.L achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than GILE.L's 0.73% return.


XGIU.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.97%
1Y
1.81%
3Y*
-0.32%
5Y*
-0.95%
10Y*

GILE.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.26%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
-0.31%
5Y*
-1.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XGIU.L vs. GILE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XGIU.L and GILE.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XGIU.L vs. GILE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGIU.L
XGIU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XGIU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGIU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGIU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XGIU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGIU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GILE.L
GILE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
GILE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
GILE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGIU.L vs. GILE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (GILE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGIU.LGILE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

0.82

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.49

1.25

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.15

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

1.72

-1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.20

4.14

-2.94

XGIU.L vs. GILE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGIU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the GILE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGIU.L and GILE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGIU.LGILE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

0.82

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

-0.20

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

-0.05

+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between XGIU.L and GILE.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XGIU.L vs. GILE.L - Dividend Comparison

XGIU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GILE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
XGIU.L
Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GILE.L
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.07%1.11%1.05%0.91%0.86%0.69%1.12%2.13%0.41%

Drawdowns

XGIU.L vs. GILE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGIU.L drawdown since its inception was -20.08%, smaller than the maximum GILE.L drawdown of -24.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGIU.L and GILE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XGIU.LGILE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.08%

-24.70%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.29%

-3.30%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.08%

-24.70%

+4.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.70%

-18.72%

+4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.92%

-9.96%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

1.08%

+1.03%

Volatility

XGIU.L vs. GILE.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (GILE.L) have volatilities of 2.02% and 2.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XGIU.LGILE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

2.08%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.51%

4.12%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

7.09%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.06%

9.01%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.79%

9.36%

+2.43%