XGDU.DE vs. SILJ
XGDU.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XGDU.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGDU.DE returned 19.58%/yr vs 14.27%/yr for SILJ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XGDU.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
XGDU.DE vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGDU.DE is traded in EUR, while SILJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SILJ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGDU.DE achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 8.27% return.
XGDU.DE
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 29.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 19.58%
- 10Y*
- —
SILJ
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 105.62%
- 3Y*
- 43.99%
- 5Y*
- 14.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
XGDU.DE vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 2.16% | 49.11% | 34.18% | 9.42% | 7.01% | 3.80% | -2.93% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 8.27% | 150.20% | 13.42% | -8.05% | -10.18% | -17.46% | 27.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGDU.DE and SILJ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XGDU.DE and SILJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGDU.DE vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
XGDU.DE
SILJ
XGDU.DE vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGDU.DE | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.17 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 7.79 | -3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGDU.DE | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 2.00 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 0.34 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.11 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
XGDU.DE vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGDU.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -74.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.DE and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGDU.DE | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -74.59% | +55.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.57% | -33.46% | +16.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -33.46% | +16.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.57% | -49.98% | +33.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.48% | -25.37% | +9.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -38.41% | +32.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.48% | 13.60% | -7.12% |
Volatility
XGDU.DE vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) is 5.51%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 17.79%. This indicates that XGDU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGDU.DE | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 17.79% | -12.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.20% | 43.46% | -23.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 53.12% | -30.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 41.84% | -25.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 44.16% | -28.38% |
XGDU.DE vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGDU.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGDU.DE vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
XGDU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.87% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XGDU.DE and SILJ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGDU.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGDU.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
XGDU.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while SILJ is Silver. XGDU.DE tracks Gold, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XGDU.DE and 0.69% for SILJ.
Find the right allocation for XGDU.DE and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer