XGDU.DE vs. 4GLD.DE
XGDU.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) and 4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - XGDU.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while 4GLD.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGDU.DE returned 19.58%/yr vs 19.85%/yr for 4GLD.DE. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XGDU.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for 4GLD.DE.
Performance
XGDU.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGDU.DE achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than 4GLD.DE's 2.80% return.
XGDU.DE
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 29.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 19.58%
- 10Y*
- —
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- 1Y
- 30.27%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 19.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
XGDU.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 2.16% | 49.11% | 34.18% | 9.42% | 7.01% | 3.80% | -2.93% |
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | 2.80% | 49.32% | 34.57% | 9.32% | 7.12% | 4.03% | -1.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGDU.DE and 4GLD.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between XGDU.DE and 4GLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGDU.DE vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGDU.DE
4GLD.DE
XGDU.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGDU.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 1.82 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 4.63 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGDU.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.65 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
XGDU.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGDU.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.DE and 4GLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGDU.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -36.79% | +18.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.57% | -16.54% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -16.54% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.57% | -16.54% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.48% | -14.95% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -11.83% | +5.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.48% | 6.52% | -0.04% |
Volatility
XGDU.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 5.09%. This indicates that XGDU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGDU.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 5.09% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.20% | 20.09% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 23.06% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 16.00% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 14.37% | +1.41% |
XGDU.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGDU.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XGDU.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGDU.DE nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, XGDU.DE and 4GLD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XGDU.DE.
XGDU.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. XGDU.DE tracks Gold, while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XGDU.DE and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for XGDU.DE and 4GLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer