XGDG.L vs. ESGP.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XGDG.L (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities) and ESGP.L (HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both Precious Metals funds - XGDG.L tracks the Gold (GBP Hedged) while ESGP.L tracks the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XGDG.L returned 29.69%/yr vs 33.25%/yr for ESGP.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XGDG.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.L.

Performance

XGDG.L vs. ESGP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGDG.L achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly higher than ESGP.L's 1.59% return.

XGDG.L

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 2.36%
• 6M: 4.37%
• 1Y: 30.94%
• 3Y*: 29.69%
• 5Y*: 16.88%
• 10Y*: —

ESGP.L

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 5.94%
• 1Y: 64.08%
• 3Y*: 33.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGDG.L vs. ESGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XGDG.L Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities	2.36%	63.15%	25.16%	11.50%	-1.40%	0.00%
ESGP.L HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF	1.59%	136.71%	3.17%	-0.39%	2.14%	-3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XGDG.L and ESGP.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2021	0.74

The correlation between XGDG.L and ESGP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XGDG.L vs. ESGP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGDG.L

XGDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
XGDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
XGDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
XGDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
XGDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XGDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

ESGP.L

ESGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 41
ESGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
ESGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
ESGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
ESGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
ESGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGDG.L vs. ESGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XGDG.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.56	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	2.00	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.26	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	2.22	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.46	5.62	-1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XGDG.L vs. ESGP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the ESGP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGDG.L and ESGP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XGDG.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	1.56	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.60	+0.27

Drawdowns

XGDG.L vs. ESGP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGDG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum ESGP.L drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDG.L and ESGP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XGDG.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.31%	-36.54%	+13.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.55%	-28.67%	+10.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.55%	-28.67%	+10.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.82%	-24.79%	+7.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-13.49%	+5.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.92%	11.38%	-4.46%

Volatility

XGDG.L vs. ESGP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L) is 6.36%, while HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L) has a volatility of 15.32%. This indicates that XGDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XGDG.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.36%	15.32%	-8.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.32%	32.61%	-10.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.25%	40.84%	-15.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.43%	33.20%	-15.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.30%	33.20%	-15.90%

XGDG.L vs. ESGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGDG.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XGDG.L vs. ESGP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XGDG.L nor ESGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XGDG.L and ESGP.L in my portfolio?

XGDG.L and ESGP.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XGDG.L or ESGP.L?

On fees, XGDG.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XGDG.L or ESGP.L?

XGDG.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.L.

What is the main difference between XGDG.L and ESGP.L?

XGDG.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while ESGP.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XGDG.L and 0.60% for ESGP.L.