XGDG.L vs. XGLD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L) and Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L).
XGDG.L and XGLD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGDG.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Gold (GBP Hedged). It was launched on May 22, 2020. XGLD.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Jun 15, 2010. Both XGDG.L and XGLD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XGDG.L vs. XGLD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XGDG.L vs. XGLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGDG.L Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities | 10.37% | 63.15% | 25.16% | 11.50% | -1.40% | -5.50% | 6.91% |
XGLD.L Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC | 10.46% | 52.88% | 28.07% | 7.70% | 11.62% | -3.28% | -2.82% |
Different Trading Currencies
XGDG.L is traded in GBp, while XGLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XGLD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XGDG.L having a 10.37% return and XGLD.L slightly higher at 10.46%.
XGDG.L
- 1D
- 3.54%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 6M
- 23.65%
- 1Y
- 50.57%
- 3Y*
- 32.49%
- 5Y*
- 20.85%
- 10Y*
- —
XGLD.L
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 23.62%
- 1Y
- 46.60%
- 3Y*
- 29.85%
- 5Y*
- 22.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGDG.L vs. XGLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGDG.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XGLD.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XGDG.L vs. XGLD.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGDG.L
XGLD.L
XGDG.L vs. XGLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L) and Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGDG.L | XGLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 1.87 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 2.31 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.67 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 10.92 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGDG.L | XGLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.87 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.54 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between XGDG.L and XGLD.L is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XGDG.L vs. XGLD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGDG.L nor XGLD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XGDG.L vs. XGLD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGDG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum XGLD.L drawdown of -41.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDG.L and XGLD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGDG.L | XGLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.31% | -45.19% | +21.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.55% | -18.08% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -21.06% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.31% | -12.11% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -19.06% | +10.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 4.65% | +0.06% |
Volatility
XGDG.L vs. XGLD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L) is 12.12%, while Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) has a volatility of 12.78%. This indicates that XGDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XGDG.L | XGLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.12% | 12.78% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.83% | 22.00% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.64% | 24.78% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 16.47% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 16.26% | +0.93% |