XGDG.L vs. CGL-C.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CGL-C.TO).
XGDG.L and CGL-C.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGDG.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Gold (GBP Hedged). It was launched on May 22, 2020. CGL-C.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Mar 31, 2011. Both XGDG.L and CGL-C.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XGDG.L vs. CGL-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XGDG.L vs. CGL-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGDG.L Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities | 10.37% | 63.15% | 25.16% | 11.50% | -1.40% | -5.50% | 6.91% |
CGL-C.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF | 10.40% | 51.39% | 28.76% | 7.01% | 10.78% | -3.24% | -3.01% |
Different Trading Currencies
XGDG.L is traded in GBp, while CGL-C.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CGL-C.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XGDG.L having a 10.37% return and CGL-C.TO slightly higher at 10.40%.
XGDG.L
- 1D
- 3.54%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 6M
- 23.65%
- 1Y
- 50.57%
- 3Y*
- 32.49%
- 5Y*
- 20.85%
- 10Y*
- —
CGL-C.TO
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 22.72%
- 1Y
- 45.39%
- 3Y*
- 29.56%
- 5Y*
- 22.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGDG.L vs. CGL-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGDG.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CGL-C.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XGDG.L vs. CGL-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XGDG.L
CGL-C.TO
XGDG.L vs. CGL-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CGL-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGDG.L | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 1.76 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 2.22 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.54 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 9.51 | +1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGDG.L | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.76 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.54 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between XGDG.L and CGL-C.TO is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XGDG.L vs. CGL-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGDG.L nor CGL-C.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XGDG.L vs. CGL-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGDG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum CGL-C.TO drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDG.L and CGL-C.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGDG.L | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.31% | -33.04% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.55% | -17.37% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -17.55% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.31% | -10.88% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -12.23% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 5.11% | -0.40% |
Volatility
XGDG.L vs. CGL-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC Securities (XGDG.L) has a higher volatility of 12.12% compared to iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CGL-C.TO) at 10.89%. This indicates that XGDG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGL-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XGDG.L | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.12% | 10.89% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.83% | 23.23% | -0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.64% | 25.95% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 16.65% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 16.51% | +0.68% |