XGD.TO vs. AMAX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX).
XGD.TO and AMAX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGD.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl Gold GR CAD. It was launched on Mar 23, 2001. AMAX is an actively managed fund by Adaptive. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009.
Performance
XGD.TO vs. AMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XGD.TO vs. AMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF | 10.99% | 144.45% | 19.63% | 3.91% | -3.10% | -4.34% |
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | 1.53% | 6.28% | 19.04% | 4.35% | -6.33% | 0.84% |
Different Trading Currencies
XGD.TO is traded in CAD, while AMAX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMAX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGD.TO achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than AMAX's 1.53% return.
XGD.TO
- 1D
- 6.65%
- 1M
- -17.83%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 23.93%
- 1Y
- 98.94%
- 3Y*
- 44.74%
- 5Y*
- 26.71%
- 10Y*
- 18.24%
AMAX
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- 10.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGD.TO vs. AMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGD.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XGD.TO vs. AMAX — Risk / Return Rank
XGD.TO
AMAX
XGD.TO vs. AMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGD.TO | AMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 0.97 | +1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 1.31 | +1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.19 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 1.72 | +1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 4.16 | +8.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGD.TO | AMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 0.97 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.57 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between XGD.TO and AMAX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XGD.TO vs. AMAX - Dividend Comparison
XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than AMAX's 10.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.93% | 1.49% | 1.80% | 1.38% | 0.35% | 0.54% | 0.25% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.57% |
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | 10.57% | 9.18% | 7.36% | 6.99% | 11.22% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XGD.TO vs. AMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, which is greater than AMAX's maximum drawdown of -11.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGD.TO and AMAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGD.TO | AMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.55% | -16.28% | -56.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.95% | -7.53% | -21.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.83% | -6.06% | -11.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.37% | -5.44% | -22.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | 2.36% | +5.57% |
Volatility
XGD.TO vs. AMAX - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.06% compared to RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) at 4.00%. This indicates that XGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XGD.TO | AMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.06% | 4.00% | +13.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.63% | 7.76% | +27.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.08% | 11.42% | +31.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.99% | 9.78% | +22.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.59% | 9.78% | +23.81% |