PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFOR vs. NANC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFOR vs. NANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (XFOR) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFOR achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than NANC's 9.48% return.


XFOR

1D
-1.73%
1M
-5.70%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
22.15%
1Y
0.25%
3Y*
-60.82%
5Y*
-56.94%
10Y*

NANC

1D
-1.03%
1M
6.13%
YTD
9.48%
6M
9.13%
1Y
26.05%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFOR vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XFOR
X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-0.75%-81.82%-12.51%-16.15%
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
9.48%18.54%26.83%20.79%

Correlation

The correlation between XFOR and NANC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFOR vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFOR
XFOR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
XFOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XFOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFOR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NANC
NANC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFOR vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (XFOR) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XFORNANCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.34

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

2.14

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.01

8.86

-8.85

XFOR vs. NANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFOR Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the NANC Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFOR and NANC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XFORNANCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

1.93

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

1.38

-1.77

Drawdowns

XFOR vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFOR drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than NANC's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFOR and NANC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFORNANCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-20.94%

-79.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.98%

-12.21%

-54.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.10%

-20.94%

-77.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.92%

-1.34%

-98.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.52%

-2.67%

-88.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.77%

2.95%

+26.82%

Volatility

XFOR vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison

X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (XFOR) has a higher volatility of 16.13% compared to Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) at 3.65%. This indicates that XFOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFORNANCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.13%

3.65%

+12.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.17%

10.38%

+42.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

127.50%

13.60%

+113.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

115.88%

16.73%

+99.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

139.31%

16.73%

+122.58%

Dividends

XFOR vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison

XFOR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.


PositionTTM202520242023
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
0.19%0.21%0.20%0.94%
XFOR
X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XFOR and NANC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XFOR has higher volatility (16.13%) compared to NANC (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFOR dropped -99.97% vs NANC's -20.94%.

NANC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFOR and NANC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer