XFLX vs. XAGG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XFLX (FundX Flexible ETF) and XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XFLX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XAGG.

Performance

XFLX vs. XAGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFLX achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than XAGG's 1.93% return.

XFLX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 4.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XAGG

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 6M: 2.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFLX vs. XAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF	1.16%	0.32%
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	1.93%	1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XFLX and XAGG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

XFLX vs. XAGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFLX

XFLX Risk / Return Rank: 39
XFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
XFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
XFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
XFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
XFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFLX vs. XAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XFLX	XAGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.54	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XFLX	XAGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	1.88	-0.94

Drawdowns

XFLX vs. XAGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFLX drawdown since its inception was -6.54%, which is greater than XAGG's maximum drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLX and XAGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFLX	XAGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.54%	-2.88%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.49%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.95%	-0.57%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XFLX	XAGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53%	3.48%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.70%	3.48%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.70%	3.48%	+1.22%

XFLX vs. XAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFLX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than XAGG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XFLX vs. XAGG - Dividend Comparison

XFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%, more than XAGG's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	3.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF	9.68%	9.80%	4.55%	4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XFLX and XAGG in my portfolio?

XFLX and XAGG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XFLX or XAGG?

On fees, XAGG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XFLX or XAGG?

XAGG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for XFLX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XFLX or XAGG?

XFLX has the higher dividend yield at 9.68%, compared with 3.86% for XAGG.

What is the main difference between XFLX and XAGG?

They also come from different issuers: FundX and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for XFLX and 0.50% for XAGG.