PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFLX vs. RJVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFLX vs. RJVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFLX achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than RJVI's 1.92% return.


XFLX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.08%
1Y
4.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RJVI

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.82%
YTD
1.92%
6M
1.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFLX vs. RJVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XFLX
FundX Flexible ETF
1.16%0.32%
RJVI
RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF
1.92%0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XFLX and RJVI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025

0.78

XFLX vs. RJVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XFLX
RJVI

Technology

17.7%
11.0%

Industrials

17.4%
9.1%

Financial Services

14.5%
13.2%

Healthcare

9.4%
14.6%

Utilities

8.9%
12.7%

Communication Services

8.5%
9.8%

Basic Materials

7.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
12.3%

Real Estate

3.7%
6.2%

Energy

2.1%
11.0%

Technology

XFLX
17.7%
RJVI
11.0%

Industrials

XFLX
17.4%
RJVI
9.1%

Financial Services

XFLX
14.5%
RJVI
13.2%

Healthcare

XFLX
9.4%
RJVI
14.6%

Utilities

XFLX
8.9%
RJVI
12.7%

Communication Services

XFLX
8.5%
RJVI
9.8%

Basic Materials

XFLX
7.0%
RJVI

-

Consumer Cyclical

XFLX
6.2%
RJVI

-

Consumer Defensive

XFLX
4.6%
RJVI
12.3%

Real Estate

XFLX
3.7%
RJVI
6.2%

Energy

XFLX
2.1%
RJVI
11.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFLX vs. RJVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFLX
XFLX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

RJVI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFLX vs. RJVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XFLXRJVIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.54

XFLX vs. RJVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XFLXRJVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.89

+0.05

Drawdowns

XFLX vs. RJVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFLX drawdown since its inception was -6.54%, which is greater than RJVI's maximum drawdown of -3.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLX and RJVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFLXRJVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-3.12%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.25%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

-1.02%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

Volatility

XFLX vs. RJVI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFLXRJVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

4.14%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

4.14%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

4.14%

+0.56%

XFLX vs. RJVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFLX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than RJVI's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

XFLX vs. RJVI - Dividend Comparison

XFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%, more than RJVI's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
RJVI
RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF
2.61%0.93%0.00%0.00%
XFLX
FundX Flexible ETF
9.68%9.80%4.55%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


XFLX and RJVI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RJVI is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RJVI is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for XFLX.

XFLX has the higher dividend yield at 9.68%, compared with 2.61% for RJVI.

They also come from different issuers: FundX and Carillon Tower Advisers. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for XFLX and 0.51% for RJVI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFLX and RJVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer