XFIV vs. VBILX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XFIV (BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and VBILX (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares) are both funds - XFIV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 5 Year Target Duration Index, while VBILX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 3 years, XFIV returned 3.51%/yr vs 4.38%/yr for VBILX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XFIV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VBILX.

Performance

XFIV vs. VBILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFIV achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than VBILX's -0.05% return.

XFIV

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: -0.47%
• 6M: -0.68%
• 1Y: 3.51%
• 3Y*: 3.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VBILX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: -0.26%
• 1Y: 5.07%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: 0.30%
• 10Y*: 1.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFIV vs. VBILX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XFIV BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	-0.47%	7.43%	1.52%	4.40%	-0.56%
VBILX Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares	-0.05%	8.57%	1.54%	6.09%	-0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XFIV and VBILX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022	0.95

The correlation between XFIV and VBILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XFIV vs. VBILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFIV

XFIV Risk / Return Rank: 27
XFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
XFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
XFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 26
XFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
XFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 27

VBILX

VBILX Risk / Return Rank: 18
VBILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
VBILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
VBILX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
VBILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
VBILX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFIV vs. VBILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XFIV	VBILX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.23	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	1.85	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.22	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	1.49	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	4.50	-0.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XFIV vs. VBILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the VBILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFIV and VBILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XFIV	VBILX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.23	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.67	-0.07

Drawdowns

XFIV vs. VBILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFIV drawdown since its inception was -6.38%, smaller than the maximum VBILX drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFIV and VBILX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFIV	VBILX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.38%	-19.26%	+12.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.91%	-3.43%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.47%	-6.05%	+1.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.15%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.15%	-1.84%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-3.16%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	1.13%	-0.16%

Volatility

XFIV vs. VBILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) is 1.09%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that XFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XFIV	VBILX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	1.44%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.41%	3.00%	-0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48%	4.16%	-0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.42%	6.39%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.42%	5.36%	+0.06%

XFIV vs. VBILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFIV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VBILX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XFIV vs. VBILX - Dividend Comparison

XFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than VBILX's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VBILX Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares	4.21%	4.01%	3.80%	3.09%	1.99%	3.39%	2.94%	2.73%	2.87%	2.73%	3.06%	3.09%
XFIV BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	3.82%	4.05%	3.92%	3.63%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XFIV and VBILX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, XFIV and VBILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XFIV or VBILX?

VBILX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to XFIV (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFIV dropped -6.38% vs VBILX's -19.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VBILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.