PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFIV vs. XSVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XFIV vs. XSVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and Bondbloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XFIV vs. XSVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XFIV
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
-0.04%7.43%1.52%4.40%-0.56%
XSVN
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
-0.05%8.18%-0.35%3.91%-1.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFIV achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly higher than XSVN's -0.05% return.


XFIV

1D
0.18%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
1.07%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
10Y*

XSVN

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.91%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
2.57%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XFIV vs. XSVN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XFIV and XSVN have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XFIV vs. XSVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFIV
XFIV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

XSVN
XSVN Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
XSVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVN Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVN Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFIV vs. XSVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and Bondbloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XFIVXSVNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

0.79

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.16

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.40

+0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.42

3.51

+1.92

XFIV vs. XSVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the XSVN Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFIV and XSVN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XFIVXSVNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.79

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.38

+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between XFIV and XSVN is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XFIV vs. XSVN - Dividend Comparison

XFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than XSVN's 4.07% yield.


Drawdowns

XFIV vs. XSVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFIV drawdown since its inception was -6.38%, smaller than the maximum XSVN drawdown of -9.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFIV and XSVN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XFIVXSVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.38%

-9.45%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

-3.18%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-2.24%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-2.56%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

1.27%

-0.46%

Volatility

XFIV vs. XSVN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) is 1.36%, while Bondbloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) has a volatility of 1.83%. This indicates that XFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XFIVXSVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.83%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.36%

3.14%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

5.21%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.51%

7.30%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.51%

7.30%

-1.79%