XEWG.L vs. BYBU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XEWG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged) and BYBU.L (Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD) are both S&P 500 funds - XEWG.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index while BYBU.L tracks the S&P 500 Buyback NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEWG.L returned 14.34%/yr vs 15.72%/yr for BYBU.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEWG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BYBU.L.

Performance

XEWG.L vs. BYBU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XEWG.L is traded in GBP, while BYBU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BYBU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XEWG.L having a 8.81% return and BYBU.L slightly lower at 8.62%.

XEWG.L

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 3.41%
• YTD: 8.81%
• 6M: 10.01%
• 1Y: 18.80%
• 3Y*: 14.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BYBU.L

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 5.72%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 9.17%
• 1Y: 23.84%
• 3Y*: 15.72%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEWG.L vs. BYBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XEWG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged	8.81%	11.07%	11.66%	11.87%	-14.07%	1.31%
BYBU.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD	8.62%	9.02%	16.67%	10.84%	-3.19%	3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XEWG.L and BYBU.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021	0.47

Over the past year, XEWG.L and BYBU.L have become more correlated (0.74) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XEWG.L vs. BYBU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XEWG.L	BYBU.L
Technology	18.3%	22.4%
Industrials	14.7%	9.0%
Financial Services	14.4%	27.9%
Healthcare	10.9%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	3.7%
Real Estate	6.2%	3.0%
Utilities	6.1%	0.9%
Energy	4.6%	5.2%
Basic Materials	4.1%	3.1%
Communication Services	4.0%	4.6%

Return for Risk

XEWG.L vs. BYBU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEWG.L

XEWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
XEWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
XEWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XEWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XEWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

BYBU.L

BYBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
BYBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
BYBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BYBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BYBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
BYBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEWG.L vs. BYBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XEWG.L	BYBU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.97	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	2.73	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.34	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	4.69	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	13.40	-3.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEWG.L vs. BYBU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the BYBU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEWG.L and BYBU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XEWG.L	BYBU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	1.97	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	1.22	-0.85

Drawdowns

XEWG.L vs. BYBU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEWG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, roughly equal to the maximum BYBU.L drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEWG.L and BYBU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEWG.L	BYBU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.61%	-23.51%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.85%	-5.06%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.42%	-20.81%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.89%	-4.19%	-2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	1.78%	+0.16%

Volatility

XEWG.L vs. BYBU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) is 2.58%, while Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that XEWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYBU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEWG.L	BYBU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	3.26%	-0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.36%	8.60%	-1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	12.07%	-1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	20.07%	-3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	25.20%	-8.65%

XEWG.L vs. BYBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEWG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BYBU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEWG.L vs. BYBU.L - Dividend Comparison

XEWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while BYBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BYBU.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XEWG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged	1.19%	1.25%	1.50%	1.24%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XEWG.L and BYBU.L in my portfolio?

XEWG.L and BYBU.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XEWG.L or BYBU.L?

On fees, BYBU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XEWG.L or BYBU.L?

BYBU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XEWG.L.

What is the main difference between XEWG.L and BYBU.L?

XEWG.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index, while BYBU.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XEWG.L and 0.15% for BYBU.L.