XEWG.L vs. PQVM.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XEWG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged) and PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - XEWG.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index while PQVM.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEWG.L returned 14.33%/yr vs 21.37%/yr for PQVM.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEWG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVM.L.

Performance

XEWG.L vs. PQVM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XEWG.L is traded in GBP, while PQVM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PQVM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEWG.L achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than PQVM.L's 16.63% return.

XEWG.L

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 10.36%
• 1Y: 19.34%
• 3Y*: 14.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQVM.L

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 16.63%
• 6M: 16.51%
• 1Y: 23.91%
• 3Y*: 21.37%
• 5Y*: 16.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEWG.L vs. PQVM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XEWG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged	8.76%	11.07%	11.66%	11.87%	-14.07%	1.31%
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	16.63%	5.56%	32.44%	1.48%	12.47%	-0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XEWG.L and PQVM.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021	0.60

The correlation between XEWG.L and PQVM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XEWG.L vs. PQVM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XEWG.L	PQVM.L
Technology	18.3%	25.6%
Industrials	14.7%	13.7%
Financial Services	14.4%	22.0%
Healthcare	10.9%	9.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	5.5%
Real Estate	6.2%	-
Utilities	6.1%	2.8%
Energy	4.6%	5.6%
Basic Materials	4.1%	2.2%
Communication Services	4.0%	9.1%

Return for Risk

XEWG.L vs. PQVM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEWG.L

XEWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
XEWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XEWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
XEWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
XEWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 60

PQVM.L

PQVM.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PQVM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PQVM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PQVM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PQVM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEWG.L vs. PQVM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XEWG.L	PQVM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.07	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	2.89	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.37	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	5.16	-2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.57	16.86	-6.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEWG.L vs. PQVM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEWG.L and PQVM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XEWG.L	PQVM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	2.07	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.84	-0.47

Drawdowns

XEWG.L vs. PQVM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEWG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, smaller than the maximum PQVM.L drawdown of -26.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEWG.L and PQVM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEWG.L	PQVM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.61%	-26.48%	+3.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.85%	-4.61%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.42%	-17.12%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.08%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.90%	-4.23%	-2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	1.41%	+0.53%

Volatility

XEWG.L vs. PQVM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) is 2.60%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that XEWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQVM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEWG.L	PQVM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	3.60%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.39%	9.06%	-1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.72%	11.50%	-0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.56%	15.83%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.56%	17.14%	-0.58%

XEWG.L vs. PQVM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEWG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVM.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEWG.L vs. PQVM.L - Dividend Comparison

XEWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than PQVM.L's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	0.78%	0.82%	0.84%	1.58%	1.79%	0.89%	1.48%	1.38%	1.68%	0.71%
XEWG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged	1.19%	1.25%	1.50%	1.24%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XEWG.L and PQVM.L in my portfolio?

XEWG.L and PQVM.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XEWG.L or PQVM.L?

On fees, XEWG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XEWG.L or PQVM.L?

XEWG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.

What is the main difference between XEWG.L and PQVM.L?

XEWG.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index, while PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XEWG.L and 0.35% for PQVM.L.