PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XESC.DE vs. CEMT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XESC.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, XESC.DE has outperformed CEMT.DE with an annualized return of 10.49%, while CEMT.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.44% annualized return.


XESC.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
4.61%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.63%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
10.49%

CEMT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XESC.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
7.20%22.24%11.06%22.50%-8.87%23.54%-2.88%30.09%-12.09%10.25%
CEMT.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%17.53%5.08%14.19%-18.24%19.63%1.61%28.81%-13.99%13.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XESC.DE and CEMT.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between XESC.DE and CEMT.DE has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XESC.DE vs. CEMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XESC.DE
XESC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMT.DE
CEMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESC.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XESC.DECEMT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.10

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

4.03

+0.90

XESC.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XESC.DE and CEMT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XESC.DECEMT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.77

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.28

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.40

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.37

-0.05

Drawdowns

XESC.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESC.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than CEMT.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESC.DE and CEMT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESC.DECEMT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.38%

-37.66%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-4.26%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-14.36%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.33%

-29.23%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

-37.66%

-0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.39%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-7.08%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

1.16%

+2.03%

Volatility

XESC.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) at 0.00%. This indicates that XESC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESC.DECEMT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

0.00%

+4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

0.00%

+13.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

6.11%

+9.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

14.61%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

16.11%

+2.16%

XESC.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XESC.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XESC.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XESC.DE nor CEMT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEMT.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


XESC.DE and CEMT.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XESC.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESC.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMT.DE.

XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CEMT.DE tracks MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XESC.DE and 0.25% for CEMT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XESC.DE and CEMT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer