CEMT.DE vs. ENGW.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L).
CEMT.DE and ENGW.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEMT.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted. It was launched on Jan 16, 2015. ENGW.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. Both CEMT.DE and ENGW.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEMT.DE vs. ENGW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEMT.DE vs. ENGW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMT.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 17.53% | 5.08% | 14.19% | -11.39% |
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF | 33.94% | 1.60% | 8.55% | 0.01% | 13.99% |
Different Trading Currencies
CEMT.DE is traded in EUR, while ENGW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ENGW.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
CEMT.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 11.76%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
ENGW.L
- 1D
- -4.72%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 33.94%
- 6M
- 37.11%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEMT.DE vs. ENGW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMT.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ENGW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEMT.DE vs. ENGW.L — Risk / Return Rank
CEMT.DE
ENGW.L
CEMT.DE vs. ENGW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMT.DE | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.24 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.63 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.80 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.26 | 6.17 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMT.DE | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.24 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.61 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMT.DE and ENGW.L is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CEMT.DE vs. ENGW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMT.DE nor ENGW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEMT.DE vs. ENGW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMT.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.66%, which is greater than ENGW.L's maximum drawdown of -23.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMT.DE and ENGW.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMT.DE | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.66% | -21.65% | -16.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -17.50% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -5.72% | +5.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -8.75% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 4.00% | -2.12% |
Volatility
CEMT.DE vs. ENGW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) is 0.00%, while SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that CEMT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEMT.DE | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 8.15% | -8.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.43% | 14.13% | -11.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.90% | 21.95% | -10.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 22.87% | -8.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 22.87% | -6.67% |