XEON.DE vs. SGLP.L
XEON.DE (Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and SGLP.L (Invesco Physical Gold A) are both exchange-traded funds - XEON.DE is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index, while SGLP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XEON.DE returned 0.70%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for SGLP.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEON.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLP.L.
Performance
XEON.DE vs. SGLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XEON.DE is traded in EUR, while SGLP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEON.DE achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than SGLP.L's -0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, XEON.DE has underperformed SGLP.L with an annualized return of 0.70%, while SGLP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.06% annualized return.
XEON.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 1.90%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 0.70%
SGLP.L
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -9.14%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 24.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.26%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
XEON.DE vs. SGLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEON.DE Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.80% | 2.25% | 3.78% | 3.30% | -0.04% | -0.58% | -0.57% | -0.49% | -0.47% | -0.52% |
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | -0.73% | 45.59% | 34.32% | 9.54% | 6.07% | 3.44% | 13.47% | 21.94% | 3.02% | -2.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEON.DE and SGLP.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2009 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEON.DE vs. SGLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XEON.DE
SGLP.L
XEON.DE vs. SGLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XEON.DE | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +19.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.27 | 1.21 | +3.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 69.36 | 1.09 | +68.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 316.53 | 3.31 | +313.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEON.DE vs. SGLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEON.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.71%, smaller than the maximum SGLP.L drawdown of -61.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEON.DE and SGLP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEON.DE | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -61.13% | +57.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -22.00% | +21.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.08% | -22.00% | +21.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.70% | -22.00% | +21.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.24% | -22.00% | +18.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -19.84% | +19.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -31.47% | +30.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 7.24% | -7.23% |
Volatility
XEON.DE vs. SGLP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) is 0.04%, while Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that XEON.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEON.DE | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.04% | 6.61% | -6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.16% | 20.72% | -20.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22% | 23.66% | -23.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.25% | 21.83% | -21.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.39% | 18.02% | -17.63% |
XEON.DE vs. SGLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEON.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SGLP.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XEON.DE vs. SGLP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XEON.DE nor SGLP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XEON.DE and SGLP.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEON.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEON.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SGLP.L.
XEON.DE is categorized as Bank Loan, while SGLP.L is Precious Metals. XEON.DE tracks Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index, while SGLP.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XEON.DE and 0.12% for SGLP.L.
Find the right allocation for XEON.DE and SGLP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer