SGLP.L vs. GSSRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SGLP.L (Invesco Physical Gold A) and GSSRX (Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund) are both funds - SGLP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while GSSRX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, SGLP.L returned 14.29%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for GSSRX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGLP.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for GSSRX.

Performance

SGLP.L vs. GSSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SGLP.L is traded in GBp, while GSSRX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GSSRX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLP.L achieves a 3.24% return, which is significantly higher than GSSRX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SGLP.L has outperformed GSSRX with an annualized return of 14.29%, while GSSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.20% annualized return.

SGLP.L

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -2.86%
• YTD: 3.24%
• 6M: 4.38%
• 1Y: 33.15%
• 3Y*: 27.94%
• 5Y*: 19.70%
• 10Y*: 14.29%

GSSRX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 5.21%
• 3Y*: 2.40%
• 5Y*: 3.02%
• 10Y*: 3.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLP.L vs. GSSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A	3.24%	53.60%	28.14%	7.26%	11.83%	-2.88%	19.99%	14.65%	4.31%	1.64%
GSSRX Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund	0.93%	-1.02%	6.36%	0.02%	5.11%	0.08%	2.74%	2.73%	5.91%	-7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLP.L and GSSRX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.25

The correlation between SGLP.L and GSSRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SGLP.L vs. GSSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLP.L

SGLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 38
SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SGLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
SGLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SGLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
SGLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

GSSRX

GSSRX Risk / Return Rank: 69
GSSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
GSSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GSSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GSSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
GSSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLP.L vs. GSSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGLP.L	GSSRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	0.86	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	1.30	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.15	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	1.06	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.03	2.93	+2.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGLP.L vs. GSSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the GSSRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLP.L and GSSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGLP.L	GSSRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	0.86	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.22	0.38	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.35	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.41	+0.12

Drawdowns

SGLP.L vs. GSSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLP.L drawdown since its inception was -38.83%, which is greater than GSSRX's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLP.L and GSSRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGLP.L	GSSRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.83%	-15.58%	-23.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.89%	-5.11%	-12.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.89%	-8.71%	-9.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.89%	-15.58%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.34%	-15.58%	-6.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.55%	-4.67%	-11.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.37%	-6.07%	-7.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.58%	1.85%	+4.73%

Volatility

SGLP.L vs. GSSRX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) at 1.53%. This indicates that SGLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGLP.L	GSSRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	1.53%	+3.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.90%	4.68%	+15.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.02%	6.36%	+16.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.11%	8.04%	+8.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.72%	9.14%	+6.58%

SGLP.L vs. GSSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GSSRX's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGLP.L vs. GSSRX - Dividend Comparison

SGLP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSSRX Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund	4.35%	4.18%	3.58%	2.36%	1.59%	1.40%	2.20%	2.87%	2.56%	2.21%	2.04%	2.15%
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGLP.L and GSSRX in my portfolio?

SGLP.L and GSSRX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.