XEON.DE vs. EXHA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and iShares eb.rexx Government Germany UCITS ETF (DE) (EXHA.DE).
XEON.DE and EXHA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XEON.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index. It was launched on May 27, 2007. EXHA.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the eb.rexx® Government Germany. It was launched on Feb 4, 2003. Both XEON.DE and EXHA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XEON.DE or EXHA.DE.
Key characteristics
XEON.DE | EXHA.DE | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 2.77% | 1.22% |
1Y Return | 3.96% | 5.27% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 1.91% | -2.73% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 0.92% | -1.96% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 0.25% | -0.35% |
Sharpe Ratio | 18.07 | 1.43 |
Daily Std Dev | 0.21% | 3.91% |
Max Drawdown | -3.71% | -16.95% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -10.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEON.DE and EXHA.DE is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XEON.DE vs. EXHA.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XEON.DE achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly higher than EXHA.DE's 1.22% return. Over the past 10 years, XEON.DE has outperformed EXHA.DE with an annualized return of 0.25%, while EXHA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.35% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XEON.DE vs. EXHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEON.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EXHA.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XEON.DE vs. EXHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and iShares eb.rexx Government Germany UCITS ETF (DE) (EXHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XEON.DE vs. EXHA.DE - Dividend Comparison
XEON.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXHA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
iShares eb.rexx Government Germany UCITS ETF (DE) | 0.60% | 0.24% | 0.53% | 0.68% | 0.56% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 1.30% | 1.64% | 1.93% | 2.10% | 2.44% |
Drawdowns
XEON.DE vs. EXHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEON.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.71%, smaller than the maximum EXHA.DE drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEON.DE and EXHA.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XEON.DE vs. EXHA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and iShares eb.rexx Government Germany UCITS ETF (DE) (EXHA.DE) have volatilities of 1.75% and 1.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.