PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEON.DE vs. DBMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEON.DE vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XEON.DE is traded in EUR, while DBMF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DBMF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEON.DE achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 14.49% return.


XEON.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
6M
1.00%
YTD
1.07%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
0.74%
ALL TIME*
0.67%

DBMF

1D
0.43%
1M
0.99%
6M
10.49%
YTD
14.49%
1Y
29.09%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEON.DE vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XEON.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C
1.07%2.25%3.78%3.30%-0.04%-0.58%-0.57%-0.31%
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
14.49%0.34%14.32%-11.67%29.14%19.83%-6.59%10.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XEON.DE and DBMF is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEON.DE vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEON.DE
XEON.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMF
DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEON.DE vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEON.DEDBMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+19.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.50

1.44

+3.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

69.40

5.29

+64.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

324.72

18.51

+306.21

XEON.DE vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio is 9.13, which is higher than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEON.DE and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEON.DE vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEON.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.71%, smaller than the maximum DBMF drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEON.DE and DBMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEON.DEDBMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-29.19%

+25.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-5.53%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.08%

-19.60%

+19.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.64%

-29.19%

+28.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.62%

+5.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-12.80%

+11.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

1.58%

-1.57%

Volatility

XEON.DE vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) is 0.04%, while iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that XEON.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEON.DEDBMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.04%

2.86%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

10.10%

-9.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

13.16%

-12.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.25%

16.00%

-15.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.39%

15.26%

-14.87%

XEON.DE vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEON.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEON.DE vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

XEON.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.11%5.91%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%
XEON.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEON.DE and DBMF have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEON.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEON.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

XEON.DE is categorized as Money Market, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XEON.DE and 0.85% for DBMF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEON.DE and DBMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer